<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">surgonco</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Креативная хирургия и онкология</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Creative surgery and oncology</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2076-3093</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2307-0501</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Башкирский государственный медицинский университет</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24060/2076-3093-2024-14-4-303-308</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">surgonco-1015</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Сравнение хирургических систем Da Vinci XI и SI при выполнении робот-ассистированной радикальной простатэктомии</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Comparison of Da Vinci XI and Da Vinci SI Surgical Systems in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2302-3315</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Папоян</surname><given-names>А. О.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Papoyan</surname><given-names>A. O.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Папоян Анушаван Оганесович — кафедра урологии и онкологии</p><p>Республика Башкортостан, Уфа</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Anushavan O. Papoyan — Department of Urology and Oncology</p><p>Ufa</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">anara_74@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4657-6625</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Урманцев</surname><given-names>М. Ф.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Urmantsev</surname><given-names>M. F.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Урманцев Марат Фаязович — к.м.н., доцент, кафедра урологии и онкологии</p><p>Республика Башкортостан, Уфа</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Marat F. Urmantsev — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assoc. Prof., Department of Urology and Oncology</p><p>Ufa</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1197-1991</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Павлов</surname><given-names>В. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Pavlov</surname><given-names>V. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Павлов Валентин Николаевич — д.м.н., профессор, академик РАН, кафедра урологии и онкологии</p><p>Республика Башкортостан, Уфа</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Valentin N. Pavlov — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Academician of Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Department of Urology and Oncology</p><p>Ufa</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Башкирский государственный медицинский университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Bashkir State Medical University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>12</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>303</fpage><lpage>308</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Папоян А.О., Урманцев М.Ф., Павлов В.Н., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Папоян А.О., Урманцев М.Ф., Павлов В.Н.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Papoyan A.O., Urmantsev M.F., Pavlov V.N.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.surgonco.ru/jour/article/view/1015">https://www.surgonco.ru/jour/article/view/1015</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Введение</title><p>Введение. Робот-ассистированная радикальная простатэктомия (РАРП) позволяет достичь отличных онкологических результатов при низкой частоте осложнений и является «золотым стандартом» радикального лечения рака предстательной железы. Целью исследования было провести сравнительный анализ эффективности двух поколений хирургических систем Da Vinci Xi и Si при выполнении РАРП.</p></sec><sec><title>Материалы и методы</title><p>Материалы и методы. Сто шестьдесят пять пациентов были разделены на группу Xi (n = 77) и группу Si (n = 88). Сравнивали периоперационные характеристики и онкологические исходы.</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты</title><p>Результаты. Демографические, клинические и онкологические характеристики двух групп пациентов были сходными и сопоставимыми. Операции с сохранением сосудисто-нервного пучка, внутритазовой фасции и лонно-простатической связки статистически значимо чаще выполнялись на системе Xi. Операционное время было значимо короче в группе Xi. Время послеоперационного восстановления и частота послеоперационных осложнений были одинаковыми. Не было различий в частоте положительных хирургических краев и биохимических рецидивов.</p></sec><sec><title>Обсуждение</title><p>Обсуждение. Мы обобщили причины сокращения времени операции: во-первых, стыковка системы Xi более удобная и время стыковки сокращается; во-вторых, производительность работы системы Xi улучшена, поэтому время работы сокращено; в-третьих, значительно уменьшаются столкновения между роботизированными руками во время операции, что ускоряет хирургический процесс.</p></sec><sec><title>Заключение</title><p>Заключение. В опытных руках выполнение РАРП безопасно и осуществимо с применением хирургических систем Da Vinci Xi и Si без повышенного риска серьезных осложнений, но периоперационные исходы лучше с системой Xi при сходных онкологических исходах.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Introduction</title><p>Introduction. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is considered to be the “gold standard” for the radical treatment of prostate cancer, achieving excellent oncological outcomes with a low incidence of complications.</p></sec><sec><title>Aim</title><p>Aim. To analyze and compare the efficiency of Da Vinci Xi and Da Vinci Si surgical systems applied in performing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Materials and methods. 165 patients were divided into two groups: Xi-group (n = 77) and Si-group (n = 88). The perioperative characteristics and oncological outcomes were analyzed and compared.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. The demographic, clinical, and oncological characteristics of the two patient groups appeared similar and comparable. Interventions involving the preservation of the neurovascular bundle, the pelvic fascia, and the puboprostatic ligament were performed using Xi system significantly more often. The surgery duration was significantly shorter in the Xi-group. The postoperative recovery time and the incidence of postoperative complications appeared to be identical across both groups. No differences were revealed in the rates of positive surgical margins or biochemical recurrence.</p></sec><sec><title>Discussion</title><p>Discussion. Reasons behind the reduced operative time were considered as follows: first, the docking of the Xi system is more user-friendly, resulting in decreased docking time; second, the operational efficiency of the Xi system had been enhanced, thereby leading to reduced workflow times; third, a number of collisions between robotic arms was significantly lower during the procedure, which accelerates the surgical process.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Conclusion. A robot-assisted radical prostatectomy performed by an experienced professional, using the Da Vinci Xi or Da Vinci Si surgical systems, appears to be safe and feasible without an increased risk of serious complications. However, the Xi system ensures better perioperative outcomes with comparable oncological results.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>рак предстательной железы</kwd><kwd>радикальная простатэктомия</kwd><kwd>робот-ассистированная хирургия</kwd><kwd>хирургическая система Da Vinci</kwd><kwd>робототехника</kwd><kwd>периоперационный период</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>prostate cancer</kwd><kwd>radical prostatectomy</kwd><kwd>robot-assisted surgery</kwd><kwd>Da Vinci surgical system</kwd><kwd>robotics</kwd><kwd>perioperative period</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Fuchs H.E., Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7–33. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21708</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Fuchs H.E., Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7–33. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21708</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Abbou C.C., Hoznek A., Salomon L., Olsson L.E., Lobontiu A., Saint F., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot. J Urol. 2001;165(6 Pt 1):1964–6. DOI: 10.1097/00005392-200106303-30827</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Abbou C.C., Hoznek A., Salomon L., Olsson L.E., Lobontiu A., Saint F., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot. J Urol. 2001;165(6 Pt 1):1964–6. DOI: 10.1097/00005392-200106303-30827</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Binder J., Jones J., Bentas W., Wolfram M., Bräutigam R., Probst M., et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopy in urology. Radical prostatectomy and reconstructive retroperitoneal interventions. Urologe A. 2002;41(2):144–9. DOI: 10.1007/s00120-002-0178-2</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Binder J., Jones J., Bentas W., Wolfram M., Bräutigam R., Probst M., et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopy in urology. Radical prostatectomy and reconstructive retroperitoneal interventions. Urologe A. 2002;41(2):144–9. DOI: 10.1007/s00120-002-0178-2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bianchi L., Gandaglia G., Fossati N., Larcher A., Pultrone C., Turri F., et al. Oncologic outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series with more than 10 years follow up. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019;71(1):38–46. DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.18.03285-X</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bianchi L., Gandaglia G., Fossati N., Larcher A., Pultrone C., Turri F., et al. Oncologic outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series with more than 10 years follow up. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019;71(1):38–46. DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.18.03285-X</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hamdy F.C., Donovan J.L., Lane J.A., Mason M., Metcalfe C., Hol­ding P., et al. 10-Year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(15):1415–24. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hamdy F.C., Donovan J.L., Lane J.A., Mason M., Metcalfe C., Hol­ding P., et al. 10-Year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(15):1415–24. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Esperto F., Cacciatore L., Tedesco F., Testa A., Callè P., Ragusa A., et al. Impact of robotic technologies on prostate cancer patients’ choice for radical treatment. J Pers Med. 2023;13(5):794. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13050794</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Esperto F., Cacciatore L., Tedesco F., Testa A., Callè P., Ragusa A., et al. Impact of robotic technologies on prostate cancer patients’ choice for radical treatment. J Pers Med. 2023;13(5):794. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13050794</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Clavien P.A., Barkun J., de Oliveira M.L., Vauthey J.N., Dindo D., Schulick R.D., et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–96. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Clavien P.A., Barkun J., de Oliveira M.L., Vauthey J.N., Dindo D., Schulick R.D., et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–96. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">van der Schans E.M., Hiep M.A.J., Consten E.C.J., Broeders I.A.M.J. From Da Vinci Si to Da Vinci Xi: realistic times in draping and docking the robot. J Robot Surg. 2020;14(6):835–9. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01057-8</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">van der Schans E.M., Hiep M.A.J., Consten E.C.J., Broeders I.A.M.J. From Da Vinci Si to Da Vinci Xi: realistic times in draping and docking the robot. J Robot Surg. 2020;14(6):835–9. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01057-8</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Abdel Raheem A., Sheikh A., Kim D.K., Alatawi A., Alabdulaali I., Han W.K., et al. Da Vinci Xi and Si platforms have equivalent perioperative outcomes during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: preliminary experience. J Robot Surg. 2017;11(1):53–61. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-016-0612-x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Abdel Raheem A., Sheikh A., Kim D.K., Alatawi A., Alabdulaali I., Han W.K., et al. Da Vinci Xi and Si platforms have equivalent perioperative outcomes during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: preliminary experience. J Robot Surg. 2017;11(1):53–61. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-016-0612-x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Feng Z., Feng M.P., Feng D.P., Solórzano C.C. Robotic-assisted adrenalectomy using Da Vinci Xi vs. Si: are there differences? J Robot Surg. 2020;14(2):349–55. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-00995-2</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Feng Z., Feng M.P., Feng D.P., Solórzano C.C. Robotic-assisted adrenalectomy using Da Vinci Xi vs. Si: are there differences? J Robot Surg. 2020;14(2):349–55. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-00995-2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lei K.Y., Xie W.J., Fu S.Q., Ma M., Sun T. A comparison of the Da Vinci Xi vs. Da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy. BMC Surg. 2021;21(1):409. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01406-w</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lei K.Y., Xie W.J., Fu S.Q., Ma M., Sun T. A comparison of the Da Vinci Xi vs. Da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy. BMC Surg. 2021;21(1):409. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01406-w</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wieder J.A., Soloway M.S. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 1998;160(2):299–315.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wieder J.A., Soloway M.S. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 1998;160(2):299–315.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chen H., Lian B., Dong Z., Wang Y., Qu M., Zhu F., et al. Experience of one single surgeon with the first 500 robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy cases in mainland China. Asian J Urol. 2020;7(2):170–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.12.004</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chen H., Lian B., Dong Z., Wang Y., Qu M., Zhu F., et al. Experience of one single surgeon with the first 500 robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy cases in mainland China. Asian J Urol. 2020;7(2):170–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.12.004</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">İnkaya A., Tahra A., Sobay R., Kumcu A., Küçük E.V., Boylu U. Comparison of surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer. Turk J Urol. 2019;45(6):410–7. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2019.48457</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">İnkaya A., Tahra A., Sobay R., Kumcu A., Küçük E.V., Boylu U. Comparison of surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer. Turk J Urol. 2019;45(6):410–7. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2019.48457</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Qi F., Wang S., Xu H., Gao Y., Cheng G., Hua L. A comparison of perioperative outcome between robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single institution. Int Braz J Urol. 2019;45(4):695–702. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0367</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Qi F., Wang S., Xu H., Gao Y., Cheng G., Hua L. A comparison of perioperative outcome between robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single institution. Int Braz J Urol. 2019;45(4):695–702. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0367</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
