<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">surgonco</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Креативная хирургия и онкология</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Creative surgery and oncology</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2076-3093</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2307-0501</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Башкирский государственный медицинский университет</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24060/2076-3093-2022-12-1-56-60</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">surgonco-675</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>КЛИНИЧЕСКИЙ СЛУЧАЙ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>CLINICAL CASES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Модификация техники наложения анастомоза при лапароскопической ректопексии с NOSE: клинический случай</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Modification of the anastomotic technique in completely laparoscopic resection rectopexy with NOSE — a case report</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0407-9660</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Моханти</surname><given-names>А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Mohanty</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>старший консультант, кафедра общей, малоинвазивной и желудочно-кишечной хирургии, </p><p>Дели</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Senior Consultant, Department of General, Minimal Access and G.I. Surgery,</p><p>Delhi</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">narcipex@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Больница Св. Стефана</institution><country>Индия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>St. Stephen’s Hospital</institution><country>India</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>06</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>56</fpage><lpage>60</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Моханти А., 2022</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Моханти А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Mohanty A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.surgonco.ru/jour/article/view/675">https://www.surgonco.ru/jour/article/view/675</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Введение</title><p>Введение. Колоректальная хирургия прошла долгий путь развития от традиционной хирургии до лапароскопических техник, таких как наложение внеполостных анастомозов ex vivo и робот-ассистированной хирургии, которые и используют сегодня большинство крупных клиник. Тем не менее ограничением для большинства данных методов остается то, что они не являются «полностью» лапароскопическими, мануальная ассистенция требуется на разных этапах от мобилизации, наложения швов и анастомозов до извлечения кишечника через специальные разрезы брюшной полости или в  точках расширения портов. Такие дополнительные доступы в брюшную полость нивелируют преимущества операции с минимальным доступом и приводят к таким осложнениям, как расхождение раны, инфекции и послеоперационные грыжи. Как решение данной проблемы возникли техника NOTES (транслюминальная эндоскопическая хирургия через естественные отверстия) и довольно новая концепция NOSE (экстракция образцов через естественные отверстия).</p></sec><sec><title>Цель</title><p>Цель. Продемонстрировать наш опыт применения новой методики лапароскопической колоректальной хирургии для уменьшения больших оперативных доступов, проводящих к осложнениям.</p></sec><sec><title>Материалы и методы</title><p>Материалы и методы. Приведен клинический случай лапароскопической резекции кишечника при проведении ректопексии и  трансректального извлечения резецированного участка с  применением модифицированной техники введения головки циркулярного сшивающего аппарата для создания анастомоза большого размера с меньшими затратами времени и, вероятно, меньшими осложнениями.</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты и обсуждение</title><p>Результаты и обсуждение. Пациенту была проведена целостная лапароскопическая резекционная ректопексия, и восстановление началось сразу после операции и прошло без осложнений. Не отмечались отсроченные послеоперационные осложнения или рецидив ректального пролапса, а также запоры, в течение периода наблюдения длительностью 6 месяцев.</p></sec><sec><title>Заключение</title><p>Заключение. Мы пришли к выводу, что данная модификация хирургической техники сокращает время операции, позволяет использовать более крупные циркулярные степлеры, теоретически снижает частоту возникновения стриктур в области анастомоза и, будучи легко воспроизводимой, может широко применяться для улучшения косметических и функциональных результатов. </p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Introduction</title><p>Introduction. We have come a long way from the era of conventional rectal surgery, with most high-volume centres now practising various degrees of laparoscopy assisted colorectal surgeries, via extracorporeal suturing, ex vivo anastomoses, hand-assisted laparoscopic resection anastomoses to robotic rectal resections. However, the limitation to most such techniques remains the fact that these are not ‘completely’ laparoscopic, with varying degrees of open assistance being required, from mobilization, suturing and anastomoses to specimen extraction via separate abdominal incisions or port-site enlargements. These ‘large’ incisions negate some of the advantages of minimal access surgery and lead to complications at such sites, such as wound breakdown, infections, and incisional herniae. This led to the origin of NOTES (Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery) and the still fairly new concept of NOSE (Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction).</p></sec><sec><title>Aim</title><p>Aim. We aim to describe our application of this new frontier in laparoscopic colorectal surgery, doing away with large scars prone to complications.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and methods</title><p>Materials and methods. We describe a case of completely laparoscopic resection rectopexy and trans-rectal extraction of the specimen, with a modified technique of anvil insertion, enabling the faster creation of a larger anastomosis with probably lower anastomotic morbidity.</p></sec><sec><title>Results and discussion</title><p>Results and discussion. The patient underwent a ‘completely’ laparoscopic resection rectopexy and had an uneventful immediate post-operative recovery. She had no delayed post-operative complications or recurrence of the rectal prolapse and remained free of constipation as well, over a follow-up period of 6 months.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Conclusion. We conclude that this modification of the surgical technique reduces operative time, allows use of larger circular staplers, theoretically reducing the incidence of anastomotic stricture, and being easily reproducible, can be widely applied for better cosmetic and functional outcome. </p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>выпадение прямой кишки</kwd><kwd>ректопексия</kwd><kwd>лапароскопия</kwd><kwd>анастомоз хирургический</kwd><kwd>послеоперационные осложнения</kwd><kwd>мало инвазивные хирургические операции</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>rectal prolapse</kwd><kwd>rectopexy</kwd><kwd>laparoscopy</kwd><kwd>surgical anastomosis</kwd><kwd>postoperative complications</kwd><kwd>minimally invasive surgical procedures</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Joubert K., Laryea J.A. Abdominal approaches to rectal prolapse. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017;30(01):57–62. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593426</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Joubert K., Laryea J.A. Abdominal approaches to rectal prolapse. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017;30(01):57–62. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593426</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Felt-Bersma R.J., Bartelsman J.F. Haemorrhoids, rectal prolapse, anal fissure, peri-anal fistulae and sexually transmitted diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23(4):575–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2009.04.010</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Felt-Bersma R.J., Bartelsman J.F. Haemorrhoids, rectal prolapse, anal fissure, peri-anal fistulae and sexually transmitted diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23(4):575–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2009.04.010</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bordeianou L., Hicks C.W., Kaiser A.M., Alavi K., Sudan R., Wise P.E. Rectal prolapse: an overview of clinical features, diagnosis, and patient-specific management strategies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(5):1059–69. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-013-2427-7</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bordeianou L., Hicks C.W., Kaiser A.M., Alavi K., Sudan R., Wise P.E. Rectal prolapse: an overview of clinical features, diagnosis, and patient-specific management strategies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(5):1059–69. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-013-2427-7</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhou T, Zhang G, Tian H, Liu Z, Xia S. Laparoscopic rectal resection versus open rectal resection with minilaparotomy for invasive rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2014 Feb;5(1):36–45. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2013.052</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhou T, Zhang G, Tian H, Liu Z, Xia S. Laparoscopic rectal resection versus open rectal resection with minilaparotomy for invasive rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2014 Feb;5(1):36–45. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2013.052</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Koulas S.G., Pappas-Gogos G., Spirou S., Roustanis E., Tsimogiannis K.E., Tsirves G., et al. Evaluations of laparoscopic proctocolectomy versus traditional technique in patients with rectal cancer. JSLS. 2009;13(4):564–73. DOI: 10.4293/108680809X12589998404489</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Koulas S.G., Pappas-Gogos G., Spirou S., Roustanis E., Tsimogiannis K.E., Tsirves G., et al. Evaluations of laparoscopic proctocolectomy versus traditional technique in patients with rectal cancer. JSLS. 2009;13(4):564–73. DOI: 10.4293/108680809X12589998404489</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Franklin M.E. Jr, Liang S., Russek K. Integration of transanal specimen extraction into laparoscopic anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a consecutive series of 179 patients. Surg Endosc.2013;27(1):127–32. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2440-z</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Franklin M.E. Jr, Liang S., Russek K. Integration of transanal specimen extraction into laparoscopic anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a consecutive series of 179 patients. Surg Endosc.2013;27(1):127–32. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2440-z</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim S.J., Choi B.J., Lee S.C. A novel single-port laparoscopic operation for colorectal with transanal specimen extraction: a comparative study. BMC Surg. 2015;15(1):10. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-15-10</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kim S.J., Choi B.J., Lee S.C. A novel single-port laparoscopic operation for colorectal with transanal specimen extraction: a comparative study. BMC Surg. 2015;15(1):10. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-15-10</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rajkumar J.S., Prabhakaran R., Akbar S., Rajkumar A.J., Venkatesan G., Rajkumar S. Totally laparoscopic resection rectopexy with transanal extraction of the specimen. Saudi Surg J. 2018;6:89–93. DOI: 10.4103/ssj.ssj_5_18</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rajkumar J.S., Prabhakaran R., Akbar S., Rajkumar A.J., Venkatesan G., Rajkumar S. Totally laparoscopic resection rectopexy with transanal extraction of the specimen. Saudi Surg J. 2018;6:89–93. DOI: 10.4103/ssj.ssj_5_18</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Guan X., Liu Z., Longo A., Cai J.C., Tzu-Liang Chen W., Chen L.C., et al. International consensus on natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2019;7(1):24–31. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goy055</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Guan X., Liu Z., Longo A., Cai J.C., Tzu-Liang Chen W., Chen L.C., et al. International consensus on natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2019;7(1):24–31. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goy055</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lundby L., Iversen L.H., Buntzen S., Wara P., Høyer K., Laurberg S. Bowel function after laparoscopic posterior sutured rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a double-blind, randomised single-centre study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;1(4):291–7. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30085-1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lundby L., Iversen L.H., Buntzen S., Wara P., Høyer K., Laurberg S. Bowel function after laparoscopic posterior sutured rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a double-blind, randomised single-centre study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;1(4):291–7. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30085-1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Marghich O., Benichou B., Amouzou E.-G., Maubert A., Etienne J. H., Benizri E., et al. Case series of mesh migration after rectopexy surgery for rectal prolapse. J Surg Case Rep. 2022;2022(2):rjac017. DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjac017</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marghich O., Benichou B., Amouzou E.-G., Maubert A., Etienne J. H., Benizri E., et al. Case series of mesh migration after rectopexy surgery for rectal prolapse. J Surg Case Rep. 2022;2022(2):rjac017. DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjac017</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rao S.S., Rattanakovit K., Patcharatrakul T. Diagnosis and management of chronic constipation in adults. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(5):295–305. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.53</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rao S.S., Rattanakovit K., Patcharatrakul T. Diagnosis and management of chronic constipation in adults. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(5):295–305. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.53</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Poljo A., Klugsberger B., Klimbacher G., Schimetta W., Shamiyeh A. Clinical outcome after resection rectopexy in patients with constipation and rectal prolapse. Ann Colorectal Res. 2021;9(1):2–7. DOI: 10.30476/acrr.2021.90321.1089</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Poljo A., Klugsberger B., Klimbacher G., Schimetta W., Shamiyeh A. Clinical outcome after resection rectopexy in patients with constipation and rectal prolapse. Ann Colorectal Res. 2021;9(1):2–7. DOI: 10.30476/acrr.2021.90321.1089</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sahoo M.R., Thimmegowda A.K., Gowda M.S. A single centre comparative study of laparoscopic mesh rectopexy versus suture rectopexy. J Minim Access Surg. 2014;10(1):18–22. DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.124456</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sahoo M.R., Thimmegowda A.K., Gowda M.S. A single centre comparative study of laparoscopic mesh rectopexy versus suture rectopexy. J Minim Access Surg. 2014;10(1):18–22. DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.124456</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
