surgoncoКреативная хирургия и онкологияCreative surgery and oncology2076-30932307-0501Башкирский государственный медицинский университет10.24060/2076-3093-2012-0-4-52-57surgonco-97Research ArticleОБЗОР ЛИТЕРАТУРЫREVIEWSРЕНТГЕНОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ ПЛОТНОСТЬ МОЛОЧНЫХ ЖЕЛЕЗ КАК ФАКТОР РИСКА РАЗВИТИЯ РАКА МОЛОЧНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫMAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY AS A BREAST CANCER RISK FACTORЗахароваН. А.ZakharovaN. A.

Захарова Наталья Александровна - доцент кафедры онкологии, лучевой диагностики и лучевой терапии.

628011, Ханты-Мансийск, Ханты-Мансийский  Автономный Округ – Югра,  ул Мира, д. 40, тел. 8 (3467) 32-45-88, e-mail: nataly-okb@yandex.ru; n.zakharova@now-uk.com

Department of Oncology, Radiology and Radiotherapy

nataly-okb@yandex.ruХанты-Мансийская государственная медицинская академияРоссияKhanty-Mansiysk State Medical AcademyRussian Federation201227012017045257Copyright © Захарова Н.А., 20172017Захарова Н.А.Zakharova N.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.surgonco.ru/jour/article/view/97

В статье представлен научный обзор литературы  по маммографической плотности как фактору  риска  развития рака  молочной железы, классификациях и методах измерения данного показателя. Высокая маммографическая плотность на сегодняшний день  является  доказанным фактором, повышающим риск развития рака  молочной железы  в 4-6  раз.  Особый  интерес  представляет то, что указанный фактор  тесно связан  и может изменяться под влиянием других факторов риска по данной патологии.  Это, возможно, открывает  возможности для  новых  направлений в первичной профилактике рака молочной железы. 

The main aim of  this paper  is give the  detailed review on mammographic density  as a breast cancer  risk factor, classification and  methods of the  evaluation. Mammographic density  is one  of  the  well-known risk factor for  breast cancer.  Several studies  have  confirmed  that  women with high breast density  have a four-fold to six-fold  greater risk for developing breast cancer  than  women with  low breast density.  The association between breast density and other  breast cancer risk factors has been shown  in the number of studies. Thus, the reducing high mammographic density may become a new way for the primary prevention of the breast cancer. 

молочная железафиброзно-железистый компонентракbreastfibro-glandular componentcancerReferencesБелилова Н.С., Белилов Ф.И. Факторы риска и профилактика рака // Клиническая медицина. – 2005. №12. С. 20-24.Белилова Н.С., Белилов Ф.И. Факторы риска и профилактика рака // Клиническая медицина. – 2005. №12. С. 20-24.Елисеева Н.А., Хуснутдинова Э.К., Камилов Ф.Х., Садыкова С.Н. Оценка риска патологии молочной железы у жителей города с развитой химической промышленностью // Креативная хирургия и онкология. 2010. №4. – С. 76-78.Елисеева Н.А., Хуснутдинова Э.К., Камилов Ф.Х., Садыкова С.Н. Оценка риска патологии молочной железы у жителей города с развитой химической промышленностью // Креативная хирургия и онкология. 2010. №4. – С. 76-78.Зиннатуллина М.Ф., М.А. Бермишева, В.А. Кононова. Прогнозирование возникновения рака молочной железы на основе генетических исследований // Креативная хирургия и онкология. 2009. №2. – С. 61-62.Зиннатуллина М.Ф., М.А. Бермишева, В.А. Кононова. Прогнозирование возникновения рака молочной железы на основе генетических исследований // Креативная хирургия и онкология. 2009. №2. – С. 61-62.Муранова О.Ю. Факторы риска рака молочной железы // Сибирский онкологический журнал. 2007. – Прил. №2 – С.76-77.Муранова О.Ю. Факторы риска рака молочной железы // Сибирский онкологический журнал. 2007. – Прил. №2 – С.76-77.Писарева Л.Ф., Мельник А.А., Одинцова И.Н., Мартынов Н.А. Рак репродуктивных органов: эпидемиология, факторы риска // Сибирский онкологический журнал. 2003. №1. – С. 56-71.Писарева Л.Ф., Мельник А.А., Одинцова И.Н., Мартынов Н.А. Рак репродуктивных органов: эпидемиология, факторы риска // Сибирский онкологический журнал. 2003. №1. – С. 56-71.Чеснокова Н.П., Барсуков В.Ю., Плохов В. Факторы риска развития рака молочной железы // Успехи современного естествознания. 2008. №1. – С. 1-7.Чеснокова Н.П., Барсуков В.Ю., Плохов В. Факторы риска развития рака молочной железы // Успехи современного естествознания. 2008. №1. – С. 1-7.Aiello E.J., Buist D.S., White E., Porter P.l. Association between mammographic breast density and breast cancer tumor characteristics // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. – 2005. №14. – P. 62–68.Aiello E.J., Buist D.S., White E., Porter P.l. Association between mammographic breast density and breast cancer tumor characteristics // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. – 2005. №14. – P. 62–68.Assi V, Warwick J, cuzick J, Duffy SW. clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density // national Review clinical Oncology – 2011. №6/9(1) – P. 33-40.Assi V, Warwick J, cuzick J, Duffy SW. clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density // national Review clinical Oncology – 2011. №6/9(1) – P. 33-40.Atkinson c., Warren R., Bingham S.A., Day n.E. Mammographic patterns as a predictive biomarker of breast cancer risk: effect of tamoxifen // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. 1999. №8. – P. 863–866.Atkinson c., Warren R., Bingham S.A., Day n.E. Mammographic patterns as a predictive biomarker of breast cancer risk: effect of tamoxifen // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. 1999. №8. – P. 863–866.Boyd n.F., guo H., Martin l.J., Sun l., et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer // new England Journal of Medicine. 2007. №356. – P. 227-236.Boyd n.F., guo H., Martin l.J., Sun l., et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer // new England Journal of Medicine. 2007. №356. – P. 227-236.Boyd n.F., lockwood D.A., Byng J.W., Tritchler D.l., yaffe M.J. Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. 1998. №7. – P. 1133-1144.Boyd n.F., lockwood D.A., Byng J.W., Tritchler D.l., yaffe M.J. Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. 1998. №7. – P. 1133-1144.Boyd n.F., Rommens J.M., Vogt K., le V., et al. Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer // lancet. 2005. №6. – P. 798-808.Boyd n.F., Rommens J.M., Vogt K., le V., et al. Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer // lancet. 2005. №6. – P. 798-808.Boyd n.F., greenberg c., lockwood g., little l. et al. Effects at two years of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on radiologic features of the breast: results from a randomized trial. canadian Diet and Breast cancer Prevention Study group // Journal of naional cancer Insitute. – 1997. №89. – С. 488-496.Boyd n.F., greenberg c., lockwood g., little l. et al. Effects at two years of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on radiologic features of the breast: results from a randomized trial. canadian Diet and Breast cancer Prevention Study group // Journal of naional cancer Insitute. – 1997. №89. – С. 488-496.Boyd n.F., guo H., Martin l.J., Sun l., et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer // new England Journal of Medicine. 2007. –№356. – P. 227-236.Boyd n.F., guo H., Martin l.J., Sun l., et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer // new England Journal of Medicine. 2007. –№356. – P. 227-236.Buist D.S., Porter P.l., lehman c. et al. Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years // Journal of national cancer Institute. -2004. №96. – P.1432–1440.Buist D.S., Porter P.l., lehman c. et al. Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years // Journal of national cancer Institute. -2004. №96. – P.1432–1440.Byng J.W., Boyd n.F., Fishell E., Jong R.A., yaffe M.J.. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities // Phys Med Biol. – 1994. №39. – P. 1629–1638.Byng J.W., Boyd n.F., Fishell E., Jong R.A., yaffe M.J.. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities // Phys Med Biol. – 1994. №39. – P. 1629–1638.Byng J. W. et al. Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms // Radiographics. – 1998. №18. – P. 1587–1598.Byng J. W. et al. Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms // Radiographics. – 1998. №18. – P. 1587–1598.Byrne c., Schairer c., Wolfe J., Parekh n. et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status // Journal of national cancer Institute. 1995. №87. – P. 1622-1629.Byrne c., Schairer c., Wolfe J., Parekh n. et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status // Journal of national cancer Institute. 1995. №87. – P. 1622-1629.chen J., Pee D., Ayyagari R., graubard B. et al. Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density // Journal of national cancer Institute. 2006. №98. – P.1215-1226.chen J., Pee D., Ayyagari R., graubard B. et al. Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density // Journal of national cancer Institute. 2006. №98. – P.1215-1226.chiu S.y-H., Duffy S.W., yen A., Tabar l. Effect of Baseline Breast Density on Breast cancer Incidence, Stage, Mortality, and Screening Parameters: 25-year Follow-up of a Swedish Mammographic Screening // cancer. Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2010. №19. – P.1219-1228.chiu S.y-H., Duffy S.W., yen A., Tabar l. Effect of Baseline Breast Density on Breast cancer Incidence, Stage, Mortality, and Screening Parameters: 25-year Follow-up of a Swedish Mammographic Screening // cancer. Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2010. №19. – P.1219-1228.chow c.K., Venzon D., Jones E.c., Premkumar A., O’Shaughnessy J., Zujewski J. Effect of tamoxifen on mammographic density // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. – 2000. №9. – P. 917– 921.chow c.K., Venzon D., Jones E.c., Premkumar A., O’Shaughnessy J., Zujewski J. Effect of tamoxifen on mammographic density // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. – 2000. №9. – P. 917– 921.cuzick J., Warwick J., Pinney E., Duffy S.W. et al. Tamoxifen and breast density in women at increased risk of breast cancer // Journal of national cancer Institute. 2004. №96. – P.621-628.cuzick J., Warwick J., Pinney E., Duffy S.W. et al. Tamoxifen and breast density in women at increased risk of breast cancer // Journal of national cancer Institute. 2004. №96. – P.621-628.D'Orsi c. J. et al. Breast imaging reporting and data system: AcR BI-RADS // Breast Imaging Atlas. – Reston: VA American college of Radiology, 2003.D'Orsi c. J. et al. Breast imaging reporting and data system: AcR BI-RADS // Breast Imaging Atlas. – Reston: VA American college of Radiology, 2003.Duffy S.W., nagtegaal I.D., Astley S.M. et al. Visually assessed breast density, breast cancer risk and the importance of the craniocaudal view // Breast cancer Research. 2008. №4. – P. 1-7.Duffy S.W., nagtegaal I.D., Astley S.M. et al. Visually assessed breast density, breast cancer risk and the importance of the craniocaudal view // Breast cancer Research. 2008. №4. – P. 1-7.glide c., Duric n., littrup P. novel approach to evaluating breast density utilizing ultrasound tomography // Medical Physics. 2007. №34. – P.744-753.glide c., Duric n., littrup P. novel approach to evaluating breast density utilizing ultrasound tomography // Medical Physics. 2007. №34. – P.744-753.Harvey J.A., Bovbjerg V.E. Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk // Radiology. – 2004. №230. – P. 29–41.Harvey J.A., Bovbjerg V.E. Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk // Radiology. – 2004. №230. – P. 29–41.Heine J. J. et al. An automated approach for estimation of breast density // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. – 2008. №17. – P. 3090–3097.Heine J. J. et al. An automated approach for estimation of breast density // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. – 2008. №17. – P. 3090–3097.Jeffreys M., Harvey J., Highnam R. comparing a new volumetric breast density method (Volpara™) to cumulus // Digital Mammography: 10th International Workshop, Iwdm. – 2010. – P. 408-413.Jeffreys M., Harvey J., Highnam R. comparing a new volumetric breast density method (Volpara™) to cumulus // Digital Mammography: 10th International Workshop, Iwdm. – 2010. – P. 408-413.Kontos D., Bakic P.R., Acciavatti R.J., conant M.F., Maidment A. A comparative study of volumetric and area-based breast density estimation in digital mammography: results from screening population // Digital Mammography: 10th International Workshop, Iwdm. – 2010. – P. 378-385.Kontos D., Bakic P.R., Acciavatti R.J., conant M.F., Maidment A. A comparative study of volumetric and area-based breast density estimation in digital mammography: results from screening population // Digital Mammography: 10th International Workshop, Iwdm. – 2010. – P. 378-385.lehman c.D., Blume J.D., Weatherall P., et al. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging // cancer. – 2005. №103. – P. 1898-1905.lehman c.D., Blume J.D., Weatherall P., et al. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging // cancer. – 2005. №103. – P. 1898-1905.lehman c.D., Isaacs c., Schnall M.D., et al. cancer yield of mammography, MR, an US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study // Radiology. №244. – P. 381-388.lehman c.D., Isaacs c., Schnall M.D., et al. cancer yield of mammography, MR, an US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study // Radiology. №244. – P. 381-388.li T., Sun l., Miller n. et al. The association of measured breast tissue characteristics with mammographic density and other risk factors for breast cancer // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. – 2005. №14. – P. 343–349.li T., Sun l., Miller n. et al. The association of measured breast tissue characteristics with mammographic density and other risk factors for breast cancer // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. – 2005. №14. – P. 343–349.lip g., Zakharova n., Duffy S.W. et al. Breast density as a predictor of breast cancer risk // Breast cancer Research. 2010. №12(3). P. 1186-2654.lip g., Zakharova n., Duffy S.W. et al. Breast density as a predictor of breast cancer risk // Breast cancer Research. 2010. №12(3). P. 1186-2654.Martin l.J., Melnichouk O., guo H. et al. Family History, Mammographic Density, and Risk of Breast cancer // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. – 2010. №19(2). P. 456-463.Martin l.J., Melnichouk O., guo H. et al. Family History, Mammographic Density, and Risk of Breast cancer // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. – 2010. №19(2). P. 456-463.Mccormack V.A., dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. – 2006. №15. – P. 1159-1169.Mccormack V.A., dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. – 2006. №15. – P. 1159-1169.Passaperuma K., Warner E., Hill K.A. et al. Is Mammographic Breast Density a Breast cancer Risk Factor in Women With BRcA Mutations? // Journal of clinical Oncology. 2010. №23. – P. 3779-3783.Passaperuma K., Warner E., Hill K.A. et al. Is Mammographic Breast Density a Breast cancer Risk Factor in Women With BRcA Mutations? // Journal of clinical Oncology. 2010. №23. – P. 3779-3783.Ren B., Smith A.P., Marshall J. Investigation of Practical Scoring Methods for Breast Density // lecture notes in computer Science. 2010. №6136. – P. 651-658.Ren B., Smith A.P., Marshall J. Investigation of Practical Scoring Methods for Breast Density // lecture notes in computer Science. 2010. №6136. – P. 651-658.Robert W., Peter D., Wasan A. Risk factors for breast cancer in women. A systematic review of the literature // nZHTA REPORT. 2007. №2. – P. 13-18.Robert W., Peter D., Wasan A. Risk factors for breast cancer in women. A systematic review of the literature // nZHTA REPORT. 2007. №2. – P. 13-18.Saftlas A.F., Hoover R.n., Brinton l.A., et al. Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer // cancer. – 1991. №67. Р. 2833–2838.Saftlas A.F., Hoover R.n., Brinton l.A., et al. Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer // cancer. – 1991. №67. Р. 2833–2838.Schousboe J.T., Kerlikowske K., loh A. cummings S.R. Personalizing Mammography by Breast Density and Other Risk Factors for Breast cancer: Analysis of Health Benefits and cost-Effectiveness // Annals of Internal Medicine. 2011. №1. – P. 10-20.Schousboe J.T., Kerlikowske K., loh A. cummings S.R. Personalizing Mammography by Breast Density and Other Risk Factors for Breast cancer: Analysis of Health Benefits and cost-Effectiveness // Annals of Internal Medicine. 2011. №1. – P. 10-20.Stone J., Warren R.M., Pinney E. et al. Determinants of percentage and area measures of mammographic density // American Journal of Epidemiology. 2009. №170. – P. 1571-1578.Stone J., Warren R.M., Pinney E. et al. Determinants of percentage and area measures of mammographic density // American Journal of Epidemiology. 2009. №170. – P. 1571-1578.Studeal A., Ma H., Bernstein l. et al. Does breast size modify the association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk? // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. 2008. №17. – P. 621-627.Studeal A., Ma H., Bernstein l. et al. Does breast size modify the association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk? // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. 2008. №17. – P. 621-627.Thomas D.B., carter R.A., Bush W.H., et al. Risk of subsequent breast cancer in relation to characteristics of screening mammograms from women less than 50 years of age // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. – 2002. №11. – P. 565–571.Thomas D.B., carter R.A., Bush W.H., et al. Risk of subsequent breast cancer in relation to characteristics of screening mammograms from women less than 50 years of age // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. – 2002. №11. – P. 565–571.Tice J.A., cummings S.R., Smith-Bindman R., Ichikawa l. Using clinical Factors and Mammographic Breast Density to Estimate Breast cancer Risk: Development and Validation of a new Predictive Model // Annals of Internal Medicine. 2008. №5. – P. 337-347.Tice J.A., cummings S.R., Smith-Bindman R., Ichikawa l. Using clinical Factors and Mammographic Breast Density to Estimate Breast cancer Risk: Development and Validation of a new Predictive Model // Annals of Internal Medicine. 2008. №5. – P. 337-347.Torres-Mejia g., De Stavola B., Allen D.S., Perez-gavilan J.J., et al. Mammographic features and subsequent risk of breast cancer: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative evaluations in the guernsey prospective studies // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. 2005. №14. – P. 1052-1059.Torres-Mejia g., De Stavola B., Allen D.S., Perez-gavilan J.J., et al. Mammographic features and subsequent risk of breast cancer: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative evaluations in the guernsey prospective studies // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. 2005. №14. – P. 1052-1059.Ursin g., Ma H., Wu A.H., Bernstein l., et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. 2003. №12. – P. 332-338.Ursin g., Ma H., Wu A.H., Bernstein l., et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. 2003. №12. – P. 332-338.Vacek P.M., geller B.M. A prospective study of breast cancer risk using routine mammographic breast density measurements // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. – 2004. №13. – P. 715–722.Vacek P.M., geller B.M. A prospective study of breast cancer risk using routine mammographic breast density measurements // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. – 2004. №13. – P. 715–722.Vachon c.M., Brandt K.R., ghosh K., Scott c.g., et al. Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. 2007. №16. – P. 43-49.Vachon c.M., Brandt K.R., ghosh K., Scott c.g., et al. Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. 2007. №16. – P. 43-49.Vachon c.M., Pankratz V.S., Scott c.g. et al. longitudinal trends in Mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. – 2007. №16. – P. 921-928.Vachon c.M., Pankratz V.S., Scott c.g. et al. longitudinal trends in Mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk // cancer Epidemiology and Biomarkers Prevention. – 2007. №16. – P. 921-928.Vachon c.M., Sellers T.A., Kuni c.c., Anderson K. Association of mammographically defined percent breast density with epidemiologic risk factors for breast cancer (United States) // cancer causes control. – 2000. №11. – P. 653-662.Vachon c.M., Sellers T.A., Kuni c.c., Anderson K. Association of mammographically defined percent breast density with epidemiologic risk factors for breast cancer (United States) // cancer causes control. – 2000. №11. – P. 653-662.Weir R., Day P., Ali W. Risk factors for breast cancer in women. A systematic review of the literature //nZHTA REPORT. 2007. №2. – P. 29-34.Weir R., Day P., Ali W. Risk factors for breast cancer in women. A systematic review of the literature //nZHTA REPORT. 2007. №2. – P. 29-34.Wolfe J.n., Saftlas A.F., Salane M. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study // American Journal of Roentgenology. – 1987. №148. – P. 1087–1092.Wolfe J.n., Saftlas A.F., Salane M. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study // American Journal of Roentgenology. – 1987. №148. – P. 1087–1092.Wong c.S., lim g.H., gao F. et al. Mammographic density and its interaction with other breast cancer risk factors in an Asian population // British Journal of cancer. 2011. №1. – P. 1-4.Wong c.S., lim g.H., gao F. et al. Mammographic density and its interaction with other breast cancer risk factors in an Asian population // British Journal of cancer. 2011. №1. – P. 1-4.yaffe M. J. Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density // Breast cancer Research. – 2008. №10. – P. 209.yaffe M. J. Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density // Breast cancer Research. – 2008. №10. – P. 209.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.