The Potential of Minimally Invasive Techniques in a Tailored Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategy for Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis
https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2025-15-3-1282-286
Abstract
Introduction. Acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP), a severe acute pancreatitis accompanied by necrosis, is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Traditional management has shifted toward minimally invasive multimodal strate‑ gies, though a choice of optimal drainage procedures is still being debated and requires evidence-based guideliness. Aim: To analyze ANP outcomes and develop an effective minimally invasive drainage algorithm to reduce complications, mortality, and length of hospitalization. Materials and methods. A prospective study (2019–2024) included 136 ANP patients managed according to necrosis score versus 140 historical controls. Necrosis extent was defined using Revised Atlanta Cclassification: mild (≤30%), moderate (30–60%), extensive (>60%). Interventions included ultrasound-guided drainage, laparoscopic necrosectomy, and early open debridement. Conservative treatment comprised antibiotics, pro‑ longed epidural analgesia, enteral feeding. Outcomes were assessed using SAPS, APACHE II/III, MODS, and SOFA scores. Statistical analysis compared frequency of complications, mortality and length of hospitalization. Results. Protocol cohort showed significant improvements: Mild necrosis: Infections ↓ to 11.1% (vs. 23.6%; *p* = 0.01), mortality ↓ to 1.1% (vs. 5.2%; *p* = 0.03). Modertae necrosis: Laparoscopic necrosectomy reduced sepsis to 37.7% (Δ = 41.1%; *p* < 0.001), mortality ↓ to 11.4% (vs. 28.3%; *p* = 0.002). Extensive necrosis: Early open debridement ↓ endotoxico‑ sis mortality to 13.7% (vs. 41.2%; *p* = 0.007), overall mortality ↓ to 34.4% (vs. 62.1%; *p* = 0.01). Overall, protocol adherence ↓ infections by 65% (21.7% vs. 62.8%; *p* < 0.001), mortality by 24% (12.4% vs. 16.4%; *p* = 0.03), and lengths of hospital stays by 22% (58 vs. 74 days; *p* = 0.002). Discussion. This study validates a necrosis score protocol as superior to historical approaches. Minimally invasive techniques are definitive for mild/moderate necrosis, while early open debridement is critical for extensive necrosis. Key innovations (epidural analgesia, early enteral nutrition, step-up drainage) synergistically reduced systemic inflammation and sepsis. The 65% infection reduction underscores protocol efficacy, though multicenter validation is warranted. Conclusion. A tailored approach significantly improves ANP out‑ comes, offering a resource-efficient template for management.
Keywords
About the Authors
Hiwa M.H. KarkhaniRussian Federation
Hiwa M.H. Karkhani — Postgraduate Student, Department of General Surgery
Moscow
Eduard A. Gallyamov
Russian Federation
Eduard A. Gallyamov — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Department of General Surgery
Moscow
Anton B. Shalygin
Russian Federation
Anton B. Shalygin — Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Moscow
Andrei Yu. Emelianov
Russian Federation
Andrei Yu. Emelianov — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assoc. Prof., Department of General Surgery
Moscow
Maria V. Shubenok
Russian Federation
Maria V. Shubenok — Surgery Unit
Moscow
Azimjon A. Yunusov
Russian Federation
Azimjon A. Yunusov — Surgery Unit
Moscow
References
1. Lee P.J., Papachristou G.I. Management of severe acute pancreatitis. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2020;18(4):670–81. DOI: 10.1007/s11938-020-00322-x
2. Gallyamov E.A., Agapov M.A., Busyrev Yu.B., Gallyamov E.E., Kakotkin V.V., Allakhverdieva A.R. Comparison of minimal invasive technologies for treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2020;3:22–8 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202003122
3. Revishvili A.Sh., Kriger A.G., Vishnevsky V.A., Smirnov A.V., Berelavichus S.V., Gorin D.S., et al. Current issues in pancreatic surgery. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2018;9:4–13 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia20180915
4. Ali-Zade S.G., Nazarov Sh.K., Kholmatov P.K., Dodikhudoev R.A. Complex diagnostics and methods of treatment of the syndrome of enteral insufficiency in patients with acute pancreatitis. Avicenna Bulletin. 2019;21(1):136–40 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25005/2074-0581-2019-21-1-136-140
5. Walkowska J., Zielinska N., Tubbs R.S., Podgórski M., Dłubek-Ruxer J., Olewnik L. Diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatitis. Diagnostics. 2022;12(8):1974. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12081974
6. Zerem E., Kurtcehajic A., Kunosić S., Zerem Malkočević D., Zerem O. Current trends in acute pancreatitis: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. World J Gastroenterol. 2023;29(18):2747–63. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i18.2747
7. Szatmary P., Grammatikopoulos T., Cai W., Huang W., Mukherjee R., Halloran C., et al. Acute pancreatitis: diagnosis and treatment. Drugs. 2022;82(12):1251–76. DOI: 10.1007/s40265-022-01766-4
8. Semyonov D.Y., Scherbyuk A.N., Morozov S.V., Lobakov A.I., Unin A.S., Averin A.A., et al. Сomparative evaluation of scales to determine severity of acute pancreatitis. Grekov’s Bulletin of Surgery. 2020;179(1):31–8 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24884/0042-4625-2020-179-1-31-38
9. Gallyamov E.A., Agapov M.A., Lutsevich O.E., Kakotkin V.V. Advanced technologies for treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis: differentiated approach. Annals of HPB surgery. 2020;25(1):69–78 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.16931/1995-5464.2020169-78
10. García-Rayado G., Cárdenas-Jaén K., de-Madaria E. Towards evidencebased and personalised care of acute pancreatitis. United European Gastroenterol J. 2020;8(4):403–9. DOI: 10.1177/2050640620903225
11. Timmerhuis H.C., van Dijk S.M., Verdonk R.C., Bollen T.L., Bruno M.J., Fockens P., et al. Various modalities accurate in diagnosing a disrupted or disconnected pancreatic duct in acute pancreatitis: a systematic review. Digestive Dis Sci. 2021;66(5):1415–24. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06413-0
12. Rudenko V.A., Kakaulina L.N., Verzakova I.V., Karamova I.M. Predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis using ultrasound markers and clinical scales. Russian Sklifosovsky Journal of Emergency Medical Care. 2022;11(2):274–9 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.23934/2223-9022-2022-11-2-274-279
13. Zhang Z.C., Luo Q.F., Wang W.S., Chen J.H., Wang C.Y., Ma D. Development and future perspectives of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022;14(11):1198–203. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i11.1198
14. Smeets X., Bouhouch N., Buxbaum J., Zhang H., Cho J., Verdonk R.C., et al. The revised Atlanta criteria more accurately reflect severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis compared to the consensus criteria. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2019;7(4):557–64. DOI: 10.1177/2050640619834839
15. Achkasov E.E., Pugaev A.V., Nabiyeva Zh.G., Kalachev S.V. Effect of different nutritional support on pancreatic secretion in acute pancreatitis. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2018;(1):14–20 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia2018114-20
16. Bogdanov S.N., Mukhin A.S., Voloshin V.N., Otdelnov L.A. Issues of acute pancreatitis classification — practical surgeon’s point of view. Perm Medical Journal. 2020;37(1):102–10 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17816/pmj371102-110
17. Dobszai D., Mátrai P., Gyöngyi Z., Csupor D., Bajor J., Erőss B., et al. Body-mass index correlates with severity and mortality in acute pancreatitis: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(6):729–43. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i6.729
18. Aperstein Y., Cohen L., Bendavid I., Cohen J., Grozovsky E., Rotem T., et al. Improved ICU mortality prediction based on SOFA scores and gastrointestinal parameters. PLoS One. 2019;14(9):e0222599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222599
19. Yelskyi I.K., Vasylyev A.A., Smirnov N.L. The efficiency of prognostic scales in stratification of acute pancreatitis. Literature review. Surgical Practice. 2020;3(43):17–28 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.38181/2223-2427-2020-3-17-28
20. Glabai V.P., Gridnev O.V., Bashankaev B.N., Bykov A.N., Krylov A.V., Kaprin A.I., et al. Surgical strategy for acute biliary pancreatitis. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2019;11:37–41 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia201911137
21. Bensman V.M., Savchenko Iu.P., Shcherba S.N., Malyshko V.V., Gnipel A.S., Golikov I.V. Surgical resolutions determining outcomes of infected pancreatic necrosis. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2018;8:12–8 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia2018812
22. Myl’nikov A.G., Pan’kov A.G., Churadze B.T., Usachev O.Iu., Shabrin A.V., Shapoval’yants S.G. The abdominal decompression for the treatment of the compartment syndrome in patients with the destructive pancreatitis. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2012;1:61–6 (In Russ.).
23. Purschke B., Bolm L., Meyer M.N., Sato H. Interventional strategies in infected necrotizing pancreatitis: Indications, timing, and outcomes. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28(27):3383–97. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3383
24. Pfister M., Probst P., Müller P.C., Antony P., Klotz R., Kalkum E., et al. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatic surgery: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. BJS Open. 2023:7(2):zrad007. DOI: 10.1093 bjsopen/zrad007
25. Nikitsina K.V. Early respiratory support in patients with acute necrotic pancreatitis. Novosti Khirurgii. 2019;27(3):300–6 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18484/2305-0047.2019.3.300
26. Neledova L.A., Mizgiriov D.V., Duberman B.L. Hemorrhagic complications of pancreatitis in surgical practice. Grekov’s Bulletin of Surgery. 2019;178(1):55–8 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24884/0042-4625-2019-178-1-55-58
Review
For citations:
Karkhani H.M., Gallyamov E.A., Shalygin A.B., Emelianov A.Yu., Shubenok M.V., Yunusov A.A. The Potential of Minimally Invasive Techniques in a Tailored Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategy for Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis. Creative surgery and oncology. 2025;15(3):282-286. https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2025-15-3-1282-286