reventive Endoprosthetics in Patients with Morbid Obesity
https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2025-15-4-321-328
Abstract
Introduction. Patients with morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m²) are at high risk of developing postoperative ventral hernias due to increased intra-abdominal pressure, anatomical features and comorbidities. The main cause of hernias are postoperative complications, including seromas, hematomas, suppurations and eventrations, as well as factors increasing intra-abdominal pressure, such as cough, constipation, physical activity, etc. Aim. To reduce the incidence of postoperative ventral hernias and complications in patients with morbid obesity. Materials and methods. A method of endoprosthetics by laparotomy for preventing the formation of postoperative ventral hernias in high-risk patients has been developed and implemented into clinical practice. This method involves placing a synthetic implant (polypropylene) into the retromuscular space with fixation to the aponeurosis of internal oblique abdominal muscles. Results. The technical result of using this method involves the formation of a dense connective tissue scar and a reduction in the incidence of postoperative ventral hernias due to minimized risk of migration and rejection of the synthetic implant. Discussion. According to the presented data, the incidence of postoperative ventral hernias in the compared groups statistically significantly decreased from 30.7 to 5.2% (p = 0.039). The differences in the development of seromas and hematomas in the main and control groups are statistically insignificant (>0.05) amounting to 21.05 and 19.2%; seromas and hematomas recovered spontaneously without invasive interventions. Conclusion. For reducing the risk of postoperative ventral hernias, patients with morbid obesity are recommended to undergo preventive endoprosthetics during laparotomy surgery. The advantage of this method involves the reduction of postoperative complications, including the occurrence of chronic pain syndrome, and the improvement of the patients’ quality of life.
About the Authors
O. V. GalimovRussian Federation
Oleg V. Galimov — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Department of Surgical Diseases, Faculty of Medicine
Ufa
G. I. Vagizova
Russian Federation
Gulnaz I. Vagizova — Department of Surgical Diseases, Faculty of Medicine
Ufa
V. O. Khanov
Russian Federation
Vladislav O. Khanov — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Department of Surgical Diseases, Faculty of Medicine
Ufa
T. R. Ibragimov
Russian Federation
Telman R. Ibragimov — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assoc. Prof., Department of Surgical Diseases, Faculty of Medicine
Ufa
A. G. Safargalina
Russian Federation
Aygul G. Safargalina — Department of Surgical Diseases, Faculty of Medicine
Ufa
References
1. Ivanov I.S., Lazarenko V.A., Ivanov S.V., Sukhov G.M., Tcukanov A.V., Goryanova G.N., et al. Disorders of the connective tissue composition structure of the anterior abdominal wall in patients with ventral hernia. Novosti Khirurgii. 2014;22(5):533–7 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18484/2305-0047.2014.5.533
2. Vanzha Ya.E., Vertyankin S.V., Yakubenko V.V., Samygin S.A., Vertyankina D.S. Prevention of incisional ventral hernias after midline laparotomy: current state of the art. Journal of Volgograd State Medical University. 2021;(2(78)):56–62 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.19163/1994-9480-2021-2(78)-56-62
3. Karimov S.S., Shonazarov I.Sh. Prevention of complications of incisional hernia repair. Research Focus. 2024;3(8):48–61 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13359651
4. Madyarov V.M., Tursunov R.B., Mukhametova S.P., Kusmanov M.E. Prevention of the risk of postoperative ventral hernias with open surgical interventions on the anterior abdominal wall. Vestnik KazNMU. 2021;(4):98–104 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.53065/kaznmu.2021.89.13.019
5. DeAngelo N., Perez A.J. Hernia prevention: the role of technique and prophylactic mesh to prevent incisional hernias. Surg Clin North Am. 2023;103(5):847–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.04.02
6. Tarasova N.K., Dynkov S.M., Pozdeev V.N., Teterin A.Yu., Osmanova G.Sh. Analysis of the causes of recurrent postoperative ventral hernias. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2019;10:36–42 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia201910136
7. Deerenberg E.B., Harlaar J.J., Steyerberg E.W., Lont H.E., van Doorn H.C., Heisterkamp J., et al. Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1254– 60. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60459-7
8. Endo T., Miyahara K., Shirasu T., Mochizuki Y., Taniguchi R., Takayama T., et al. Risk factors for incisional hernia after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. In Vivo. 2023;37(6):2803–7. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13393
9. Galimov O.V., Khanov V.O., Vagizova G.I Prophylactic placement of mesh implants during laparotomy surgery in patients with morbid obesity. Therapeutic Archive. 2022;94(2S):329 (In Russ.).
10. Kulchenko N.G. Open tension-free hernioplasty: advantages and disadvantages. RMJ. 2023;8:15–9 (In Russ.).
11. Sanders D.L., Pawlak M.M., de Beaux A.C. European Hernia Society incisional hernia guidelines. Br J Surg. 2023;110(3):343. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac456
12. El-Khadrawy O.H., Moussa G., Mansour O., Hashish M.S. Prophylactic prosthetic reinforcement of midline abdominal incisions in high-risk patients. Hernia. 2009;13(3):267–74. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-009-0484-3
13. Sazhin A.V., Loban K.M., Ivakhov G.B., Petukhov V.A., Glagolev N.S., Andriyashkin A.V., et al. Endovideosurgical retromuscular methods for ventral hernia repair surgery. Endoscopic Surgery. 2020;26(6):41–8 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/endoskop20202606141
14. Bittner R., Bingener-Casey J., Dietz U., Fabian M., Ferzli G.S., Fortelny R.H., et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)-part 1. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(1):2–29. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3170-6
15. Galimov O.V., Khanov V.O., Vagizova G.I., Nasyrova K.V., Minigalin D.M. Method for preventing formation of postoperative ventral hernias in highrisk patients: Russian Federation patent 2833156С1. 2025 Jan 14 (In Russ.).
16. Keshvedinova A.A., Smirnov A.V., Stankevich V.R., Sharobaro V.I., Ivanov Yu.V. Treatment of ventral hernias in patients with morbid obesity. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2023;9:95–102 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202309195
17. Anwar S. The use of prosthetics in hernia repair. Hosp Med. 2003;64(1):34–5. DOI: 10.12968/hosp.2003.64.1.1842
18. Germer C.T., Dietz U.A. Narbenhernien. Chirurgie. 2024;95:1–2. DOI: 10.1007/s00104-023-02017-2
19. Soare A.M., Cârţu D., Nechita S.L., Andronic O., Șurlin V. Complications of intraperitoneal mesh techniques for incisional hernia — a systematic review. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2021;116(6 Suppl):S36–42. PMID: 35274610
20. Mahajan N.N., da Silveira C.A.B., Kasmirski J.A., Lima D.L., Lech G.E., Moraes L.B.L., et al. Risk factors for incisional hernia after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia. 2024;28(6):2137–44. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03182-x
21. Reyes-Sánchez A., Valenzuela-González J., Valle-Valdez M.A., GarcíaRamos C. Incisional hernia, a rare complication of the anterolateral transpsoas approach. Acta Ortop Mex. 2020;34(2):134–8. PMID: 33244916
22. Berríos-Torres S.I., Umscheid C.A., Bratzler D.W., Leas B., Stone E.C., Kelz R.R., et al. Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(8):784–91. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904. Erratum in: JAMA Surg. 2017;152(8):803. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1943
23. Le Ruyet A., Pillet B., Végleur A., Jourdan A., Bel-Brunon A., Bouré L., et al. Impact of a prophylactic mesh on the biomechanics of abdominal wall closure: an animal study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2025;168:107014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107014
24. Borab Z.M., Shakir S., Lanni M.A., Tecce M.G., MacDonald J., Hope W.W., et al. Does prophylactic mesh placement in elective, midline laparotomy reduce the incidence of incisional hernia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery. 2017;161(4):1149–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.036
25. Hew C.Y., Rais T., Antoniou S.A., Deerenberg E.B., Antoniou G.A. Prophylactic mesh reinforcement versus primary suture for abdominal wall closure after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with midline laparotomy incision: updated systematic review including time-to-event meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Vasc Surg. 2024;109:149–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.06.026
26. Bravo-Salva A., Argudo-Aguirre N., González-Castillo A.M., Membrilla-Fernandez E., Sancho-Insenser J.J., Grande-Posa L., et al. Long-term follow-up of prophylactic mesh reinforcement after emergency laparotomy. A retrospective controlled study. BMC Surg. 2021;21(1):243. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01243-x
27. Ahmed J., Hasnain N., Fatima I., Malik F., Chaudhary M.A., Ahmad J., et al. Prophylactic mesh placement for the prevention of incisional hernia in high-risk patients after abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus. 2020;12(9):e10491. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.10491
28. Ibrahim M.M., Poveromo L.P., Glisson R.R., Cornejo A., Farjat A.E., Gall K., et al. Modifying hernia mesh design to improve device mechanical performance and promote tension-free repair. J Biomech. 2018;71:43–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.01.022
29. Schmitz S.M., Helmedag M.J., Kroh A., Heise D., Klinge U., Lambertz A., et al. Choice of polymer, but not mesh structure variation, reduces the risk of bacterial infection with staphylococcus aureus in vivo. Biomedicines. 2023;11(7):2083. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11072083
30. Borchardt R.A., Tzizik D. Update on surgical site infections: The new CDC guidelines. J Am Acad Phys Assist. 2018;31(4):52–4. DOI: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000531052.82007.42
Review
For citations:
Galimov O.V., Vagizova G.I., Khanov V.O., Ibragimov T.R., Safargalina A.G. reventive Endoprosthetics in Patients with Morbid Obesity. Creative surgery and oncology. 2025;15(4):321-328. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2025-15-4-321-328


























