BACKGROUND OF THE ANATOMY OF PERITONEAL CARCINOMATOSIS. ANALYSIS OF LITERATURE AND SHAREHOLDERS DATA
https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2013-0-3-79-84
Abstract
In the article the anatomical features of the peritoneum structure have been described in accordance with the medical records supplemented by the author’s illustrations. The functional differences of various peritoneum areas are shown based on its structure. Also, issues relating to the anatomical features of the peritoneum such as «hatches» and its influence on the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis have been touched upon.
About the Authors
R. Sh. Ishmuratova
Bashkir State Medical University, Сentral Research Laboratory
Russian Federation
Oncology Chair with courses of Oncology and Pathoanatomy, Ufa
Russian Federation
Oncology Chair with courses of Oncology and Pathoanatomy, Ufa
Sh. R. Kzyrgalin
Bashkir State Medical University, Сentral Research Laboratory
Russian Federation
Oncology Chair with courses of Oncology and Pathoanatomy, Ufa
Russian Federation
Oncology Chair with courses of Oncology and Pathoanatomy, Ufa
K. Sh. Gantsev
Bashkir State Medical University, Сentral Research Laboratory
Russian Federation
Oncology Chair with courses of Oncology and Pathoanatomy, Ufa
Russian Federation
Oncology Chair with courses of Oncology and Pathoanatomy, Ufa
R. S. Minigazimov
Bashkir State Medical University, Сentral Research Laboratory
Russian Federation
Oncology Chair with courses of Oncology and Pathoanatomy, Ufa
Russian Federation
Oncology Chair with courses of Oncology and Pathoanatomy, Ufa
S. V. Solomenny
Bashkir State Medical University, Сentral Research Laboratory
Russian Federation
Oncology Chair with courses of Oncology and Pathoanatomy, Ufa
Russian Federation
Oncology Chair with courses of Oncology and Pathoanatomy, Ufa
L. V. Khalikova
Bashkir State Medical University, Сentral Research Laboratory
Russian Federation
Oncology Chair with courses of Oncology and Pathoanatomy, Ufa
Russian Federation
Oncology Chair with courses of Oncology and Pathoanatomy, Ufa
References
1. Банин В.В. Физиологическое значение градиента сосудистой проницаемости в брюшине / В.В. Банин // Механизмы поддержания гомеостаза в системе микроциркуляции / Под ред. И.И. Новикова и Я.Л. Караганова. – М., 1981. – С.116-125.
2. Барон М.А. Локализация сосудов в толще серозы и ее барьерная функция // Сб. работ по физиологии. М., 1939. – С. 3-24.
3. Ганцев Ш.Х. Перитонеальный канцероматоз – новый взгляд на проблему [Электронный ресурс] // Креативная онкология и хирургия. -2013. №1 (10.03.2013). URL:http///eoncosurg. com/?p=3294(дата обращения: 13.09.2013).
4. Димитров Н. К микроскопической анатомии кровеносных сосудов диафрагмы // Морфологические основы микроциркуляции. – М., 1965. –С. 90-97.
5. Димитров Н. К микроскопической анатомии кровеносных сосудов диафрагмы // Морфологические основы микроциркуляции. – М., 1965. – С. 90-97.
6. Иванова В.Ф. Роль мезотелия париетальной брюшины в процессе всасывания истинных растворов и взвеси туши из брюшной полости // Бюл. экспер. биол. и мед., 1986. – Вып.10. – С.1258-1261.
7. Козлов В.И. Гистофизиология капилляров / В.И. Козлов, Е.П. Мельман, Е.М. Нейко, Б.В. Шутка. СПб.: Наука, 1994. – 234 с.
8. Иванова В.Ф. Роль мезотелия париетальной брюшины в процессе всасывания истинных растворов и взвеси туши из брюшной полости // Бюл. экспер. биол. и мед. –М., 1986. – Вып.10. – С.1258-1261.
9. Кораблев А.В. Петлевидный рост сосудов как основополагающий принцип васкулогенеза // Архив АГЭ, 1990. – Т. 99. – №10. – С. 45-52.
10. Куприянов В.В. Пути микроциркуляции. Кишинев: Изд-во Картя Молдовеняске, 1969. – 258 с.
11. Baez S. Bayliss response in the microcirculation // Fed. Proc. – 1968. – Vol. 27. – P. 1410-1415.
12. Chaffanjon P.C. Omental anatomy of nonhuman primates / P.C. Chaffanjon, N.M. Kenyon, C. Ricordi, N.S. Kenyon // Surg. Radiol. Anat., 2005. – Vol. 27. – №4. – P. 287-291.
13. Fedorko M.E. Studies on transport of macromolecules and small particles across mesothelial cells of the mouse omentum (I. Morphologiec aspects) / M.E. Fedorko, J.G. Hirsch // Exp. Cell. Res. 1971. – №69. – P. 113-127.
14. Flessner M.F. The importance of the interstitium in peritoneal transport / Perit. Dial. Int., 1996. – №16. – P. 76-79.
15. Healy J.C. The peritoneum, mesenteries and omenta: normal anatomy and pathological processes / J.C. Healy, R.H. Reznek // Eur. Radiol. 1998. – Vol. 8. – №6. – P. 886-900.
16. Johnson P.C. The microcirculation and local and humoral control of the circulation // In: cardiovascular physiology. 1974. – P. 163-171.
17. Krediet R.T. Peritoneal membrane failure in peritoneal dialysis patients. / R.T. Krediet, S. Van Esch, W. Smit, W.M. Michels, M.M. Zweers, M.M. Ho-DacPannekeet, D.G. // Struijk Blood Purif. 2002. – Vol. 20. – №5. – P. 489-493.
18. Shinohara H., Kominami R., Taniguchi Y. et al. The distribution and morphology of lymphatic vessels on the peritoneal surface of the adult human diaphragm, as revealed by an ink-absorption method // Okajimas Folia Anat. Jpn. 2003. – Vol. 79. – №6. – P. 175-183.
19. Tsilibary E.C. S.L.Wissing Lymphatic absorption from peritoneal cavity: regulation of patency of mesothelial stomata // Microvasc. Res. 1983. – Vol. 25. – №1. – P. 22-39.
20. Tsilibary E.C. S.L.Wissing Lymphatic absorption from peritoneal cavity: regulation of patency of mesothelial stomata // Microvasc. Res. 1983. – Vol. 25. – №1. – P. 22-39.
Review
For citations:
Ishmuratova R.Sh., Kzyrgalin Sh.R., Gantsev K.Sh., Minigazimov R.S., Solomenny S.V., Khalikova L.V. BACKGROUND OF THE ANATOMY OF PERITONEAL CARCINOMATOSIS. ANALYSIS OF LITERATURE AND SHAREHOLDERS DATA. Creative surgery and oncology. 2013;(3):79-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2013-0-3-79-84
Views:
580
Email this article 