COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF DISEASES AND NEW FORMATIONS OF THE PROSTATE GLAND
https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2017-7-2-22-27
Abstract
Prostate cancer prevalence is in fourth place in the overall structure of tumors and in second place among malignant diseases in older men. The cancer detection rate of preventive inspections using traditional research methods remains very low, and the timeliness of early diagnosis of tumors of the prostate gland determine the modern methods of X-ray imaging. The aim of this study was to estimate the role of computed tomography as a method of Xray imaging, in identifying the various prostate neoplasia with specification of semiotics, diagnostic criteria of various tumors. Research conducted at multispiral 128-slice CT scanner OPTIMA 660 produced by General Electric (United States). The study involved 66 patients aged 38-79 years with various diseases of the prostate. The fact of referral to the computed tomography was preceded by a primary appointment at urology specialist followed by rectal finger study positive or dubious reaction to prostate specific antigen, by transrectal ultrasound. The study showed that CT is not a universal method of diagnosis, excluding other imaging techniques, especially multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. But that method has a number of incontestable advantages that allow to remain indispensable in the algorithm integrated diagnostic approach. First of all, it is an extensive long area of scanning combined with small thickness of the layer to be allocated. And, in the case of some phase strengthening of the gland tissues the technique, in some cases, allows to trace a malignant neoplastic process. But in general, its differential diagnosis with benign regeneration nodes in the gland tissue is usually difficult and requires further modification.
About the Authors
D. E. Baikov
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation
Baykov Denis Enverovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Head of the General Radiodiagnosis Department of Bashkir State Medical University Clinics, Professor of the General Surgery Department with a Course of Radiodiagnostics
Russian Federation
Baykov Denis Enverovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Head of the General Radiodiagnosis Department of Bashkir State Medical University Clinics, Professor of the General Surgery Department with a Course of Radiodiagnostics
E. I. Kalacheva
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation
Kalachyova Elvira Ildarovna – Chair of CT and MRI Laboratory, radiologist of Bashkir State Medical University Clinics, Postgraduate at the General Surgery Department with a Course of Radiodiagnostics
Russian Federation
Kalachyova Elvira Ildarovna – Chair of CT and MRI Laboratory, radiologist of Bashkir State Medical University Clinics, Postgraduate at the General Surgery Department with a Course of Radiodiagnostics
D. A. Kim
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation
Kim Dmitriy Anatolevich – Radiologist
Russian Federation
Kim Dmitriy Anatolevich – Radiologist
A. E. Ryakhovskiy
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation
Ryakhovskiy Anrey Evgenevich – Postgraduate at the Pathological Physiology Department
Russian Federation
Ryakhovskiy Anrey Evgenevich – Postgraduate at the Pathological Physiology Department
L. A. Shingareeva
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation
Shingareeva Liliya Ayratovna – Radiologist of Bashkir State Medical University Clinics, Postgraduate at the General Surgery Department with a Course of Radiodiagnostics
Russian Federation
Shingareeva Liliya Ayratovna – Radiologist of Bashkir State Medical University Clinics, Postgraduate at the General Surgery Department with a Course of Radiodiagnostics
G. V. Baykova
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation
Baykova Galina Vladimirovna – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor at the Pediatrics Department of the Additional Professional Edication Institution
Russian Federation
Baykova Galina Vladimirovna – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor at the Pediatrics Department of the Additional Professional Edication Institution
References
1. Китаев СВ. Диагностика рака предстательной железы: современное состояние вопроса. Определение стадии рака предстательной железы. Ч. 3 (Обзор литературы). Медицинская визуализация. 2009;(1):89-93. [Kitaev SV. Diagnosis of a prostate cancer. Pt. III: prostate cancer staging (Review article). Med Visualisation. 2009;(1):89-93 (in Russ.)].
2. Китаев СВ, Павленко КА, Кочин АВ. Значение динамической МРТ с гадодиамидом для ранней диагностики рака предстательной железы. Медицинская визуализация. 2007;(5):91-97. [Kitaev SV, Pavlenko KA, Kochin AV. The importance of dynamic MRI with omniscan for early diagnostics of a prostate cancer. Med Visualisation. 2007;(5):91-97 (in Russ.)].
3. Ахвердиева ГИ, Санай ЭБ, Панов ВО, Губский ИЛ, Тюрин ИЕ, Долгушин БИ, и др. Мультипараметрическая МРТ в диагностике рака предстательной железы. Российский электронный журнал лучевой диагностики. 2013;3(4):109-19. [Akhverdieva GI, Sanay EB, Panov VO, Gubskiy IL, Tyurin IE, Dolgushin BI, et al. Multiparametric MRI in diagnosis of prostate cancer Russ Electron J Radiol. 2013;3(4):109-19 (in Russ.)].
4. Давыдов МИ. Статистика злокачественных новообразований в России и странах СНГ в 2004 г. Вестн РОНЦ им. Н.Н. Блохина РАМН. 2006;17(3):132. [Davydov MI. Statistics of malignant neoplasms in Russian Federation and CIS for 2004. J N N Blokhin Rus Cancer Res. Center RAMS. 2006;17(3):132 (in Russ.)].
5. Чиссова ВИ, Старинский ВВ, Петрова ГВ. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2011 году (заболеваемость и смертность).М.: ФГБУ «МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена» Минздрава России;2013. 289.
6. Ахвердиева ГИ, Панов ВО, Тюрин ИЕ, Долгушин БИ, Матвеев ВБ, Камолов БШ, и др. Мультипараметрическая магнитно-резонансная томография в диагностике локального рецидива рака предстательной железы после радикальной простатэктомии. Онкоурология. 2015;11(4):72-79. [Akhverdiyeva GI, Panov VO, Tyurin IE, Dolgushin BI, Matveev VB, Kamalov BSh, et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of local recurrence of prostate cancer in patients after radical prostatectomy. Cancer Urol. 2015;11(4):72-79 (in Russ.)].
7. Ахвердиева ГИ, Санай ЭБ, Панов ВО, Тюрин ИЕ, Матвеев ВБ, Шимановский НЛ. Роль искусственного контрастирования при МРТ диагностике рака предстательной железы (обзор литературы). Медицинская визуализация. 2012;(1):92-101. [Ahverdieva GI, Sanaii EB, Panov VO, Turin IE, Matveev VB, Shimanovskii NL. Contrast enhancement in MRIdiagnostics of prostate cancer. Med Visualisation. 2012;(1):92-101 (in Russ.)].
8. Мухомор АИ, Ахвердиева ГИ, Санай ЭБ, Панов ВО, Абдуллаев РЯ, Губский ИЛ, и др. Комплексное трансректальное ультразвуковое исследование с цветовым допплеровским кодированием, допплерографией и соноэластографией в выявлении рака предстательной железы. Онкоурология. 2013;(2):4252. [Mukhomor АI, Hagverdiyeva GI, Sanay EB, Panov VO, Abdullaiev RYa, Gubskii IL, et al. Complex transrectal US with color flow mapping, Doppler sonography and sonoelastografiey in prostate cancer evaluation. Cancer Urol. 2013;(2):42-52 (in Russ.)].
9. Москаленко ЕА, Петров СБ, Толкач ЮВ, Мищенко АВ. Современный подход к диагностике рака предстательной железы с использованием магнитно-резонансной спектроскопии (клиническое исследование). Онкоурология. 2011;(1):25-30. [Moskalenko EA, Petrov SB, Tolkach YuV, Mishchenko AV. Current approaches to diagnosing prostate cancer, by applying magnetic resonance spectroscopy (a clinical study). Cancer Urol. 2011;(1):25-30 (in Russ.)].
10. Труфанов ГЕ, Тютина ЛА. Магнитно-резонансная спектроскопия: руководство для врачей. СПб.:ЭЛБИ-СПб;2008.
11. Afaq A, Batura D, Bomanji J. New frontiers in prostate cancer imaging: clinical utility of prostatespecific membrane antigen positron emission tomography. Int Urol Nephrol. 2017;49(5):803-10. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-017-1541-y.
12. Li HL, Xia JG, Xie SW, Guo YF, Xin M, Li FH. Prostate cancer: a comparison of the diagnostic performance of transrectal ultrasound versus contrast enhanced transrectal ultrasound in different clinical characteristics Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(11):21428-34. PubMed ID: 26885087.
13. Fuchsjager M, Akin O, Shukla-Dave A, Pucar D, Hricak H. The role of MRI and MRSI in diagnosis, treatment selection, and post-treatment follow-up for prostate cancer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2009;7:193202. PMID: 19398944.
14. Jung AJ, Coakley FV, Shinohara K, Carroll PR, Kurhanewicz J, Cowan JE, Westphalen AC. Local staging of prostate cancer: comparative accuracy of T2-weighted endorectal MR imaging and transrectal ultrasound. Clin Imag. 2012;36(5):547-552. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2011.11.028.
Review
For citations:
Baikov D.E., Kalacheva E.I., Kim D.A., Ryakhovskiy A.E., Shingareeva L.A., Baykova G.V. COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF DISEASES AND NEW FORMATIONS OF THE PROSTATE GLAND. Creative surgery and oncology. 2017;7(2):22-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2017-7-2-22-27
Views:
4675
Email this article 