Complication during Endovascular Intervention: Acute Ischemia of the Lower Extremity as a Result of Spiral Dissection with Antegrade Puncture of the Left Common Femoral Artery
https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2018-8-3-237-242
Abstract
Introduction. Over the past decade, endovascular interventions have become widely used in patients with obliterating atherosclerosis of lower extremity arteries. This is due to the low-trauma nature of the methodology, various technological achievements in the improvement of instruments and the accumulation of operational experience. However, despite all the successes achieved, no intervention is without its complications. In the case of endovascular interventions, complications are most commonly associated with the site of arterial access. One of the most widely-used arterial approaches is retrograde femoral access. However, if an intervention is planned on the femoropopliteal arterial segment, the antegrade femoral approach is generally the method of choice. Among the advantages of antegrade access can be noted the shorter path to the site, better toolkit support and a shorter operation duration. One of the main complications involved in antegrade access is the development of dissection. Although this complication occurs in less than 1% of cases, it carries a threat of critical ischemia of the lower limbs, which may require emergency open surgery up to and including emergency limb amputation.
Materials and methods. The paper presents a clinical case of successful treatment of iatrogenic spiral dissection, which occurred following antegrade vascular access. During surgical treatment of this complication, stents were implanted throughout the dissection to “press” the exfoliated layer of the intima.
Results. The study presents a case of iatrogenic spiral dissection after antegrade femoral puncture followed by successful endovascular treatment of this complication.
Conclusion. Endovascular balloon angioplasty and stenting can be successfully used when iatrogenic dissection develops following antegrade puncture of the right femoral artery, allowing classic “open” surgical intervention to be avoided.
About the Authors
D. K. VasilievRussian Federation
Physician of the Department of Roentgen-Endovascular Diagnostics and Treatment, 10 building 3 Petroverigskii lane, Moscow, 101990, Russian Federation.
B. A. Rudenko
Russian Federation
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Leading Researcher of the Laboratory of Roentgen-
Endovascular Diagnostics and Treatment, 10 building 3 Petroverigskii lane, Moscow, 101990, Russian Federation.
A. S. Shanoyan
Russian Federation
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Roentgen-Endovascular Diagnostics and Treatment, 10 building 3 Petroverigskii lane, Moscow, 101990, Russian Federation.
V. P. Mazaev
Russian Federation
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Head of the Laboratory of Roentgen-Endovascular Diagnostics and Treatment, 10 building 3 Petroverigskii lane, Moscow, 101990, Russian Federation.
F. B. Shukurov
Russian Federation
Physician of the Department of Roentgen-Endovascular Diagnostics and Treatment, 10 building 3 Petroverigskii lane, Moscow, 101990, Russian Federation.
O. M. Drapkina
Russian Federation
Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director
of National Medical Research Centre for Preventive Medicine, 10 building 3 Petroverigskii lane, Moscow, 101990, Russian Federation.
References
1. Hanna E.B., Prout D.L. Combined radial-tibial access strategy and radial-tibial reverse CART in a patient with aortobifemoral graft and complex superficial femoral artery occlusion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;90(3):471–5. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27024
2. Takayama T., Matsumura J.S. Complete lower extremity revascularization via a hybrid procedure for patients with critical limb ischemia. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2018;52(4):255–61. DOI: 10.1177/1538574418761723
3. Mandzhgaladze T.G., Kudykin M.N., Kalitko I.M., Derkach V.V. Hybrid method of revascularization of distal arterial lesions in patients with critical lower limb ischemia. Russian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2018;60(1):12–8. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24022/0236-2791-2018-60-1-12-18
4. Rao S.V., Ou F.S., Wang T.Y., Roe M.T., Brindis R., Rumsfeld J.S. et al. Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;1:379–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.05.007
5. Huang H.L., Chou H.H., Wu T.Y., Chang S.H., Tsai Y.J., Hung S.S. et al. Endovascular intervention in Taiwanese patients with critical limb ischemia: Patient outcomes in 333 consecutive limb procedures with a 3-year follow-up. J Formos Med Assoc. 2014;113(10):688–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.10.022
6. Li Y., Esmail A., Donas K.P., Pitoulias G., Torsello G., Bisdas T. et al. Antegrade vs Crossover femoral artery access in the endovascular treatment of isolated below-the-knee lesions in patients with critical limb ischemia. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24(3):331–6. DOI: 10.1177/1526602817701251
7. Janczak D., Malinowski M., Bąkowski W., Krakowska K., Marschollek K., Marschollek P. et al. Comparison of the incidence of complications and secondary surgical interventions necessary in patients with chronic lower limb ischemia treated by both open and endovascular surgeries. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;23(3):135–40. DOI: 10.5761/atcs.oa.16-00282
8. Nie S.P., Lopes Lao E.P., Wang X., Liu X.M., Qiao Y., Li J. et al. Angiographic evaluation of a new technique for common femoral artery access: the inguinal ligament-guided approach. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(2):1542–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.032
9. Chang C.K., Scali S.T., Feezor R.J., Beck A.W., Waterman A.L., Huber T.S. et al. Defining utility and predicting outcome of cadaveric lower extremity bypass grafts in patients with critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(6):1554–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.06.009
10. Santo V.J., Dargon P., Azarbal A.F., Liem T.K., Mitchell E.L., Landry G.J. et al. Lower extremity autologous vein bypass for critical limb ischemia is not adversely affected by prior endovascular procedure. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(1):129–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.01.013
11. Armstrong E.J., Ryan M.P., Baker E.R., Martinsen B.J., Kotlarz H., Gunnarsson C. Risk of major amputation or death among patients with critical limb ischemia initially treated with endovascular intervention, surgical bypass, minor amputation, or conservative management. J Med Econ. 2017;20(11):1148–54. DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1361961
12. Baril D.T., Ghosh K., Rosen A.B. Trends in the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of acute lower extremity ischemia in the United States Medicare population. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(3):669–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.244
13. Mendes B.C., Oderich G.S., Fleming M.D., Misra S., Duncan A.A., Kalra M. et al. Clinical significance of embolic events in patients undergoing endovascular femoropopliteal interventions with or without embolic protection devices. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(2):359–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.07.119
14. Davis F.M., Albright J., Gallagher K.A., Gurm H.S., Koenig G.C., Schreiber T. et al. Early outcomes following endovascular, open surgical, and hybrid revascularization for lower extremity acute limb ischemia. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018;51:106–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.12.025
15. Byrne R.M., Taha A.G., Avgerinos E., Marone L.K., Makaroun M.S., Chaer R.A. Contemporary outcomes of endovascular interventions for acute limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(4):988–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.054
Review
For citations:
Vasiliev D.K., Rudenko B.A., Shanoyan A.S., Mazaev V.P., Shukurov F.B., Drapkina O.M. Complication during Endovascular Intervention: Acute Ischemia of the Lower Extremity as a Result of Spiral Dissection with Antegrade Puncture of the Left Common Femoral Artery. Creative surgery and oncology. 2018;8(3):237-242. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2018-8-3-237-242