Preview

Creative surgery and oncology

Advanced search

Surgical Treatment for Branched Endograft Thrombosis of the Abdominal Aorta

https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2023-13-3-244-248

Abstract

Introduction. Endovascular intervention was firstly introduced for repairing aortic aneurysms in the early 1990s. The greatest advantage of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is its minimally-invasive character, thus implying shorter post-operative period. The operative mortality rate comprises 3.3 % (95 % CI 2.9–3.6); however, according to recent studies, the rate has declined to 1.4 % due to a rapid improvement in outcomes. According to the DREAM-trial, the incidence of a branched endograft thrombosis accounts for 6.4% within the first 30 days. The EVAR trial reports an incidence of 2.6% after the first year of follow-up. Stent bending and small distal aortic diameters (less than 20 mm) are believed to be the most common causes of endograft thrombosis.
Aim. To identify the causes of complications following the abdominal aortic stent-graft repair and to determine the optimal treatment strategy.
Materials and methods. The paper presents a case of 71-year-old patient with late complication after endovascular abdominal aortic repair of an infrarenal aortic aneurysm. The patient was admitted to the hospital on January 05, 2020 as an emergency due to the pain in the left lower limb. On December 03, 2019 the patient underwent endovascular abdominal aortic repair. Angiography of January 06, 2020 revealed thrombosis of the left branch of the stent graft. Thrombectomy of the brunched left stent graft, left iliac artery and balloon dilatation of the brunched left stent-graft were performed.
Results and discussion. Endovascular abdominal aortic repair stands as the first choice for patients with appropriate aortic anatomy and those with significant comorbidity. Despite the significant progress in endovascular abdominal aortic repairing, the EVAR procedure is followed by a nearly fivefold increase in the 30-day reintervention rate as compared to open surgery which comprises 9.8 % according to the EVAR-I, and 18 %, according to the EVAR-II trials.
Conclusion. Our multidisciplinary team consisted of vascular and endovascular surgeons managed to perform hybrid surgery, thus eliminating the EVAR-associated complication together with its cause.

About the Authors

A. R. Gilemkhanov
Bashkir State Medical University; Clinic of Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation

Albert R. Gilemkhanov - Department of Hospital Surgery, Unit of Roentgen Endovascular Diagnostics and Treatment

Ufa



V. V. Plechev
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation

Vladimir V. Plechev - Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Department of Hospital Surgery

Ufa



A. A. Bakirov
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation

Anvar A. Bakirov - Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Department of General Surgery with Transplantology and X-ray Diagnostics Courses for Advanced Professional Education

Ufa



R. F. Safin
Clinic of Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation

Ruslan F. Safin - Vascular Surgery Unit

Ufa



R. E. Abdrakhmanov
Bashkir State Medical University; Clinic of Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation

Rustam E. Abdrakhmanov - Department of Hospital Surgery, Unit of Roentgen Endovascular Diagnostics and Treatment

Ufa



S. I. Blagodarov
Bashkir State Medical University; Clinic of Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation

Sergey I. Blagodarov - Department of Hospital Surgery, Unit of Roentgen Endovascular Diagnostics and Treatment

Ufa



T. R. Ibragimov
Bashkir State Medical University; Clinic of Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation

Teymur R. Ibragimov - Department of Surgical Diseases and New Technologies, Unit of Roentgen Endovascular Diagnostics and Treatment

Ufa



I. M. Gilemkhanova
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation

Ilmira M. Gilemkhanova - Postgraduate Student, Department of Neurosurgery and Medical Rehabilitation with a Course of Advanced Professional Education

Ufa



References

1. Ascoli Marchetti A., Oddi F.M., Tonidandel L., Ranucci A., Caruso C., Battistini M., et al. Successful conversion strategy in patient submitted to EVAR demanding open surgery: comparative analysis 1997-2011 vs 2012-2020. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2021;22(4):1641–7. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2204171

2. Conti M., Ferrarini A., Finotello A., Salsano G., Auricchio F., Palombo D., et al. Patient-specific computational fl uid dynamics of femoropopliteal stent-graft thrombosis. Med Eng Phys. 2020;86:57–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.10.011

3. Doumenc B., Mesnard T., Patterson B.O., Azzaoui R., De Préville A., Haulon S., et al. Management of type IA endoleak after EVAR by explantation or custom made fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021;61(4):571–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.10.033

4. D’Oria M., Pipitone M., Riccitelli F., Mastrorilli D., Calvagna C., Zamolo F., et al. Custom-made unibody conical endografts for elective endovascular repair of saccular infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms with narrow aortic bifurcations-novel implementation of the aortoaortic concept. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;59:309.e5–309.e10. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.12.102

5. Chaurasia A., Garg T., Ahuja R., Ferra M. Endovascular treatment of arteriovenous graft dysfunction as a result of graft delamination and fracture. CVIR Endovasc. 2021;4(1):1. DOI: 10.1186/s42155-020-00181-8

6. Haidar H., Kapahnke S., Frese J.P., Omran S., Mueller V., Hinterseher I., et al. Risk factors for elective and urgent open conversion after EVAR-a retrospective observational study. Vascular. 2022 Nov 22:17085381221141118. DOI: 10.1177/17085381221141118

7. Oguslu U., Uyanik S.A., Çevik Cenkeri H., Atli E., Yilmaz B., Gümüş B. Endovascular recanalization and remodeling of abdominal aorta stent graft chronic total occlusion after failed extra-anatomic bypass surgery. Vascular. 2022;30(5):1008–12. DOI: 10.1177/17085381211040905

8. Kuroki M.T., Ferranti K., Aziz F., Radtka J. Recanalization of previously thrombosed type II endoleak with aneurysm sac expansion after systemic thrombolysis. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2018;4(3):262–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2018.05.008

9. Rahim A.A., Ibrahim R., Yao L., Shen Cheok W., Ismail M. Reintervention rate in endovascular vs open surgical repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021;69:102703. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102703

10. Siribumrungwong B., Kurita J., Ueda T., Yasui D., Takahashi K.I., Sasaki T., et al. Outcomes of abdominal aorticт aneurysm repairs: Endovascular vs open surgical repairs. Asian J Surg. 2022;45(1):346–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.06.015

11. Wang E., Xie X., Xu D., Shu X., Zhao Y.F., Zhang Y., et al. Patients with symptomatic AAAs are more likely to develop lumen partial-thrombus after endovascular aortic repair than asymptomatic patients. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:848848. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.848848

12. Stokmans R.A., Teijink J.A., Forbes T.L., Böckler D., Peeters P.J., Riambau V., et al. Early results from the ENGAGE registry: real-world performance of the Endurant Stent Graft for endovascular AAA repair in 1262 patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44(4):369–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.07.005

13. Takeuchi Y., Morikage N., Mizoguchi T., Nagase T., Samura M., Ueda K., et al. Using bifurcated endoprosthesis after iliac artery recanalization for concomitant abdominal aortic aneurysm and chronic total occlusions of access routes. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(1):117–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.08.191

14. Fujimura N., Imazuru T., Matsumura H., Shibata T., Furuyama T., Kaneko K., et al. Two-year results of a multicenter prospective observational study of the Zenith Spiral-Z limb deployed in the external iliac artery during endovascular aneurysm repair. Circ J. 2020;84(10):1764–70. DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0195

15. Faure E.M., El Batti S., Abou Rjeili M., Julia P., Alsac J.M. Mid-term outcomes of stent assisted balloon induced intimal disruption and relamination in aortic dissection repair (STABILISE) in acute type B aortic dissection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;56(2):209–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.04.008


Review

For citations:


Gilemkhanov A.R., Plechev V.V., Bakirov A.A., Safin R.F., Abdrakhmanov R.E., Blagodarov S.I., Ibragimov T.R., Gilemkhanova I.M. Surgical Treatment for Branched Endograft Thrombosis of the Abdominal Aorta. Creative surgery and oncology. 2023;13(3):244-248. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2023-13-3-244-248

Views: 1032


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2076-3093 (Print)
ISSN 2307-0501 (Online)