Stent-Graft Treatment of Anterior Interventricular Artery Extravasation Type IIICS: a Clinical Case
https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2020-10-4-296-301
Abstract
Background. Every percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is potentially causative of severe surgical accidents. Routine manipulations with catheters, guidewire, delivery systems or stents can damage vascular walls leading to immediate complications like extravasation. In interventional cardiology, ruptures occur in 0.19–0.93% of PCI cases. The endovascular surgeon is to immediately react in case of an accident and decide on further action to repair the coronary artery rupture.
Materials and methods. The article describes a clinical case of a PCI complication, extravasation type IIICS, during a routine stenting of anterior interventricular artery. Stentgrafting at rapture was decided upon conclusive analysis of the situation.
Results and discussion. A percutaneous coronary intervention, including routine surgery, potentially poses diverse complications. Extravasation is an expectable complication type. The endovascular surgeon must be sufficiently experienced to decide on an appropriate tactics. The outcome of stentgraft implantation was satisfactory.
Conclusion. Stentgraft placement may be a method of choice in a PCI complication of surgery like extravasation type IIICS.
About the Authors
M. O. Loginov
G.G. Kuvatov Republican Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Department of Interventional Radiology
Ufa
Russian Federation
Department of Interventional Radiology
Ufa
E. S. Fayzullin
G.G. Kuvatov Republican Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Department of Interventional Radiology
Ufa
Russian Federation
Department of Interventional Radiology
Ufa
D. F. Shakurov
G.G. Kuvatov Republican Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Department of Interventional Radiology
Ufa
Russian Federation
Department of Interventional Radiology
Ufa
G. U. Mhitaryan
G.G. Kuvatov Republican Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Department of Interventional Radiology
Ufa
Russian Federation
Department of Interventional Radiology
Ufa
References
1. Lemmert M.E., van Bommel R.J., Diletti R., Wilschut J.M., de Jaegere P.P., Zijlstra F., et al. Clinical characteristics and management of coronary artery perforations: a single-center 11-year experience and practical overview. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(9):e007049. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007049
2. Claessen B.E., Mehran R. Hope for the best, prepare for the worst: How to manage coronary perforations. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93(4):E255–6. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28055
3. Shaukat A., Tajti P., Sandoval Y., Stanberry L., Garberich R., Nicholas Burke M., et al. Incidence, predictors, management and outcomes of coronary perforations. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93(1):48–56. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27706
4. Chowdhury M.A., Sheikh M.A. Coronary bypass graft perforation during percutaneous intervention. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016;17(1):48–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.11.004
5. Ellis S.G., Ajluni S., Arnold A.Z., Popma J.J., Bittl J.A., Eigler N.L., et al. Increased coronary perforation in the new device era. Incidence, classification, management, and outcome. Circulation. 1994;90(6):2725–30. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.90.6.2725
6. Krishnegowda C., Puttegowda B., Krishnappa S., Ananthakrishna R., Mahadevappa N.C., Siddegowda S.K., et al. Incidence, clinical and angiographic characteristics, management and outcomes of coronary artery perforation at a high volume cardiac care center during percutaneous coronary intervention. Indian Heart J. 2020;72(4):232–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.07.012
7. Vasil’eva O.I., Mazurenko S.O. Complications of percutaneous coronary interventions — tasks to be solved. The Hospital. 2019;(2):36–9 (In Russ.)
8. Grechishkin A.A., Maingart S.V., Nekrasov A.S., Fedorchenko A.N., Porhanov V.A. Possible treatment approaches for distal coronary artery perforation. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2020;17(1):66–70 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.35401/2500-0268-2020-17-1-66-70
9. Plechev V.V., Risberg R.Yu., Buzaev I.V., Oleinik B.A., Kharasova A.F. Сomplications of percutaneous coronary interventions. Bashkortostan Medical Journal. 2016;11(6):102–8 (In Russ.)
10. Mirza A.J., Taha A.Y., Aldoori J.S., Hawas J.M., Hassan K.W. Coronary artery perforation complicating percutaneous coronary intervention. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2018;26(2):101–6. DOI: 10.1177/0218492318755182
11. Solomonica A., Kerner A., Feld Y., Yalonetsky S. Novel technique for the treatment of coronary artery perforation. Can J Cardiol. 2020;36(8):1326.e1–e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.03.017
12. Nairooz R., Parzynski C.S., Curtis J.P., Mohsen A., McNulty E., Uretsky B.F., et al. Contemporary trends, predictors and outcomes of perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention (from the NCDR Cath PCI Registry). Am J Cardiol. 2020;130:37–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.06.014
13. Giannini F., Candilio L., Mitomo S., Ruparelia N., Chieffo A., Baldetti L., et al. A practical approach to the management of complications during percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(18):1797–810. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.05.052
14. Shi H., Wang J., Vorvolakos K., White K., Duraiswamy N. Pre-clinical evaluation of surface coating performance in guidewire surrogates: potential implications for coated interventional surgical devices. J Biomater Appl. 2020;34(7):928–41. DOI: 10.1177/0885328219884453
15. Lee M.S., Shamouelian A., Dahodwala M.Q. Coronary artery perforation following percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol. 2016;28(3):122–31. PMID: 26945255
Supplementary files
|
1. Video. Treatment of Anterior Interventricular Artery Extravasation Type IIICS | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
Download
(14MB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
Review
For citations:
Loginov M.O., Fayzullin E.S., Shakurov D.F., Mhitaryan G.U. Stent-Graft Treatment of Anterior Interventricular Artery Extravasation Type IIICS: a Clinical Case. Creative surgery and oncology. 2020;10(4):296-301. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2020-10-4-296-301
Views:
4501
Email this article 