Preview

Creative surgery and oncology

Advanced search

Specific Features of Ovarian Cancer Metastasis

https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2020-10-4-319-329

Abstract

This review presents data on the predominant mechanisms of metastatic progression of ovarian cancer. The  morphological and functional features of the greater omentum are shown, both promoting the spread of  cancer cells and having an antitumour effect. The ratio of these two mutually opposite properties depends on  the cellular composition, the content of extracellular matrix molecules and the biomechanical properties of the greater omentum during carcinogenesis. Milky spots are the main site of cancer cell implantation. They differ  from lymph nodes in a simpler structure and a unique cellular composition (macrophages, B cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, other immune cells) changing significantly during metastasis. М2­macrophages,  adipocytes, CD33+ and CD4+ CD25high CD127low Т­suppressors promote migration, invasion, growth and colonization of cancer cells. The majority of the molecules synthesized in the greater omentum during metastasis also stimulate this process. The exceptions are E­cadherin, CXCL10, CXCL11, CXCR3, which inhibit the growth of tumour foci. In addition, CD8+ T lymphocytes and M1 macrophages also have antitumor  effects. Since ovarian cancer is characterized by high mortality, mainly due to metastases, the issue of  optimizing methods for predicting the treatment effectiveness depending on the cellular composition and expression of specific molecules in the milky spots of the greater omentum is urgent. These indicators can be applied in clinical practice using molecular genetic and immunohistochemical methods. In order to determine the need for omenectomy in the surgical treatment of ovarian cancer and to predict the outcome, it is advisable to study the morphological and functional properties of the greater omentum and to determine the number of immunocompetent cells and the nature of the expression of genes associated with the worst prognosis, those encoding activin­A, N­cadherin, CCL23, CD36, CD44, CF­1/M­CSF, FABP4, GRO­α, GRO­β, IL­8, ITGA2, MMP9, TP53, VEGF, VEGFR. These molecules are associated with adhesion and angiogenesis systems that play a key role in metastasis. Promising directions in the therapy of metastatic ovarian cancer can be stimulation of the transition of M2­ to M1­macrophages, activation of the anti­tumour antigen­specific response of CD8+ T cells using phagocytes, adaptive transfer of natural killer cells, the use of inhibitors of Wnt pathways,  CCR1, CD36, FABP4, PAD4, ITGA2.

About the Authors

R. N. Mustafin
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Department of Medical Genetics and Fundamental Medicine

Ufa


L. V. Khalikova
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation
Department of Histology

Ufa


E. K. Khusnutdinova
Institute of Biochemistry & Genetics of Ufa Science Centre of the RAS
Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Professor

Ufa


References

1. Stewart C., Ralyea C., Lockwood S. Ovarian cancer: an integrated review. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2019;35(2):151–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2019.02.001

2. Yeung T.L., Leung C.S., Yip K.P., Au Yeung C.L., Wong S.T., Mok S.C. Cellular and molecular processes in ovarian cancer metastasis. A Review in the Theme: Cell and Molecular Processes in Cancer Metastasis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2015;309(7):C444–56. DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00188.2015

3. Lengyel E. Ovarian cancer development and metastasis. Am J Pathol. 2010;177(3):1053–64. DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.100105

4. Weidle U.H., Birzele F., Kollmorgen G., Rueger R. Mechanisms and targets involved in dissemination of ovarian cancer. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2016;13(6):407–23. DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20004

5. Krishnan V., Clark R., Chekmareva M., Johnson A., George S., Shaw P., et al. In vivo and ex vivo approaches to study ovarian cancer metastatic colonization of milky spot structures in peritoneal adipose. J Vis Exp. 2015;(105):e52721. DOI: 10.3791/52721

6. Sorensen E.W., Gerber S.A., Sedlacek A.L., Rybalko V.Y., Chan W.M., Lord E.M. Omental immune aggregates and tumor metastasis within the peritoneal cavity. Immunol Res. 2009;45(2–3):185–94. DOI: 10.1007/s12026-009-8100-2

7. Gerber S.A., Rybalko V.Y., Bigelow C.E., Lugade A.A., Foster T.H., Frelinger J.G., et al. Preferential attachment of peritoneal tumor metastases to omental immune aggregates and possible role of a unique vascular microenvironment in metastatic survival and growth. Am J Pathol. 2006;169(5):1739–52. DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.051222

8. Meza-Perez S., Randall T.D. Immunological functions of the omentum. Trends Immunol. 2017;38(7):526–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2017.03.002

9. Liu J., Geng X., Li Y. Milky spots: omental functional units and hotbeds for peritoneal cancer metastasis. Tumor Biol. 2016;37:5715–26. DOI: 10.1007/s13277-016-4887-3

10. Clark R., Krishnan V., Schoof M., Rodriguez I., Theriault B., Chekmareva M., et al. Milky spots promote ovarian cancer metastatic colonization of peritoneal adipose in experimental models. Am J Pathol. 2013;183(2):576–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.04.023

11. Ben Arie A., McNally L., Kapp D.S., Teng N.N. The omentum and omentectomy in epithelial ovarian cancer: a reappraisal. Part I. Omental function and history of omentectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;131(3):780–3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.09.014

12. Arie A.B., McNally L., Kapp D.S., Teng N.N. The omentum and omentectomy in epithelial ovarian cancer: a reappraisal. Part II. The role of omentectomy in the staging and treatment of apparent early stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;131(3):784–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.09.013

13. McNally L., Teng N.N., Kapp D.S., Karam A. Does omentectomy in epithelial ovarian cancer affect survival? An analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015;25(4):607–15. DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000412

14. Bahar S.G., Rokkam V.R. Omentum Tumors. [Updated 2020 Oct 10]. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK563226/

15. Havrlentova L., Faistova H., Mazur M., Ziak D., Polak S. Comparative analysis of human omental milky spots between the patients with colon cancer and the control group. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2017;118(10):580–4. DOI: 10.4149/BLL_2017_111

16. Cipolletta D., Cohen P., Spiegelman B.M., Benoist C., Mathis D. Appearance and disappearance of the mRNA signature characteristic of Treg cells in visceral adipose tissue: age, diet, and PPARγ effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(2):482–7. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1423486112

17. Ke X., Shen L. Targeting cytokines secreted by CD4+ CD25high CD127low regulatory T cells inhibits ovarian cancer progression. Scand J Immunol. 2019;89(2):e12736. DOI: 10.1111/sji.12736

18. Krishnan V., Tallapragada S., Schaar B., Kamat K., Chanana A.M., Zhang Y., et al. Omental macrophages secrete chemokine ligands that promote ovarian cancer colonization of the omentum via CCR1. Commun Biol. 2020;3(1):524. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-020-01246-z

19. Etzerodt A., Moulin M., Doktor T.K., Delfini M., Mossadegh-Keller N., Bajenoff M., et al. Tissue-resident macrophages in omentum promote metastatic spread of ovarian cancer. J Exp Med. 2020;217(4):e20191869. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20191869

20. Lee W., Ko S.Y., Mohamed M.S., Kenny H.A., Lengyel E., Naora H. Neutrophils facilitate ovarian cancer premetastatic niche formation in the omentum. J Exp Med. 2019;216(1):176–94. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20181170

21. Zhang Q., Zhou W., Yu S., Ju Y., Kit Yan To S., Sze Tsai Wong A., et al. Metabolic reprogramming of ovarian cancer involves ACSL1-mediated metastasis stimulation through upregulated protein myristoylation. Oncogene. 2021;40:97–111. DOI: 10.1038/s41388-020-01516-4

22. Nieman K.M., Kenny H.A., Penicka C.V., Ladanyi A., Buell-Gutbrod R., Zillhardt M.R., et al. Adipocytes promote ovarian cancer metastasis and provide energy for rapid tumor growth. Nat Med. 2011;17(11):1498–503. DOI: 10.1038/nm.2492

23. Ladanyi A., Mukherjee A., Kenny H.A., Johnson A., Mitra A.K., Sundaresan S., et al. Adipocyte-induced CD36 expression drives ovarian cancer progression and metastasis. Oncogene. 2018;37(17):2285–301. DOI: 10.1038/s41388-017-0093-z

24. Hu J., Liu Z., Wang X. Does TP53 mutation promote ovarian cancer metastasis to omentum by regulating lipid metabolism. Med Hypotheses. 2013;81(4):515–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2013.06.009

25. Cole A.J., Dwight T., Gill A.J., Dickson K.-A., Zhu Y., Clarkson A., et al. Assessing mutant p53 in primary high-grade serous ovarian cancer using immunohistochamistry and massively parallel sequencing. Sci Rep. 2016;6:26191. DOI: 10.1038/srep26191

26. McKenzie A.J., Hicks S.R., Svec K.V., Naughton H., Edmunds Z.L., Howe A.K. The mechanical microenvironment regulates ovarian cancer cell morphology, migration, and spheroid disaggregation. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):7228. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25589-0

27. Huang Y.L., Liang C.Y., Ritz D., Coelho R., Septiadi D., Estermann M., et al. Collagen-rich omentum is a premetastatic niche for integrin α2-mediated peritoneal metastasis. Elife. 2020;9:e59442. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.59442

28. Nakamura K., Sawada K., Kinose Y., Yoshimura A., Toda A., Nakatsuka E., et al. Exosomes promote ovarian cancer cell invasion through transfer of CD44 to peritoneal mesothelial cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2017;15(1):78–92. DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-16-0191

29. Paschos K.A., Canovas D., Bird N.C. The engagement of selectins and their ligands in colorectal cancer liver metastases. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14(1-2):165–74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00852.x

30. Winiarski B.K., Cope N., Alexander M., Pilling L.C., Warren S., Acheson N., et al. Clinical relevance of increased endothelial and mesothelial expression of proangiogenic proteases and VEGFA in the omentum of patients with metastatic ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma. Transl Oncol. 2014;7(2):267–76.e4. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2014.02.013

31. Wang H., Huang X., Zhang J., Shao N., Chen L.O., Ma D., et al. The expression of VEGF and Dll4/Notch pathway molecules in ovarian cancer. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;436:243– 8. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.06.005

32. Sopo M., Anttila M., Hämäläinen K., Kivelä A., Ylä- Herttuala S., Kosma V.M., et al. Expression profiles of VEGF-A, VEGF-D and VEGFR1 are higher in distant metastases than in matched primary high grade epithelial ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):584. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5757-3

33. Roggiani F., Mezzanzanica D., Rea K., Tomassetti A. Guidance of signaling activations by cadherins and integrins in epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(9):1387. DOI: 10.3390/ijms17091387

34. Mui K.L., Chen C.S., Assoian R.K. The mechanical regulation of integrin-cadherin crosstalk organizes cells, signaling and forces. J Cell Sci. 2016;129(6):1093–100. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.183699

35. Makrilia N., Kollias A., Manolopoulos L., Syrigos K. Cell adhesion molecules: role and clinical significance in cancer. Cancer Invest. 2009;27(10):1023–37. DOI: 10.3109/07357900902769749

36. Yi Y., Cheng J.C., Klausen C., Leung P.C.K. Activin A promotes ovarian cancer cell migration by suppressing E-cadherin expression. Exp Cell Res. 2019;382(2):111471. DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.06.016

37. Janiszewska M., Primi M.C., Izard T. Cell adhesion in cancer: Beyond the migration of single cells. J Biol Chem. 2020;295(8):2495–05. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.REV119.007759

38. Wong C.W., Dye D.E., Coombe D.R. The role of immunoglobulin superfamily cell adhesion molecules in cancer metastasis. Int J Cell Biol. 2012; 2012:340296. DOI: 10.1155/2012/340296

39. Borsig L. Selectins in cancer immunity. Glycobiology. 2018;28(9):648–55. DOI: 10.1093/glycob/cwx105

40. Khaustova N.A., Maltseva D.V., Oliveira-Ferrer L., Stürken C., MildeLangosch K., Makarova J.A., et al. Selectin-independent adhesion during ovarian cancer metastasis. Biochimie. 2017;142:197–206. DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2017.09.009

41. Carroll M.J., Fogg K.C., Patel H.A., Krause H.B., Mancha A.S., Patankar M.S., et al. Alternatively-activated macrophages upregulate mesothelial expression of P-selectin to enhance adhesion of ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2018;78(13):3560–73. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-3341

42. Rangel-Moreno J., Moyron-Quiroz J.E., Carragher D.M., Kusser K., Hartson L., Moquin A., et al. Omental milky spots develop in the absence of lymphoid tissue-inducer cells and support B and T cell responses to peritoneal antigens. Immunity. 2009;30(5):731–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.03.014

43. Martinez F.O., Gordon S. The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment. F1000Prime Rep. 2014;6:13. DOI: 10.12703/P6-13

44. Zhang L., Conejo-Garcia J.R., Katsaros D., Gimotty P.A., Massobrio M., Regnani G., et al. Intratumoral T cells, recurrence, and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(3):203–13. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa020177

45. Sato E., Olson S.H., Ahn J., Bundy B., Nishikawa H., Qian F., et al. Intraepithelial CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and a high CD8+/regulatory T cell ratio are associated with favorable prognosis in ovarian cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(51):18538–43. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0509182102

46. Wouters M.C., Komdeur F.L., Workel H.H., Klip H.G., Plat A., Kooi N.M., et al. Treatment regimen, surgical outcome, and T-cell differentiation influence prognostic benefit of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(3):714–24. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1617

47. Pinto M.P., Balmaceda C., Bravo M.L., Kato S., Villarroel A., Owen G.I., et al. Patient inflammatory status and CD4+/CD8+ intraepithelial tumor lymphocyte infiltration are predictors of outcomes in highgrade serous ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2018;151(1):10–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.07.025

48. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011;474(7353):609–15. DOI: 10.1038/nature10166

49. Horikawa N., Abiko K., Matsumura N., Hamanishi J., Baba T., Yamaguchi K., et al. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in ovarian cancer inhibits tumor immunity through the accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(2):587–99. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0387

50. Van der Meer J.M.R., Maas R.J.A., Guldevall K., Klarenaar K., de Jonge P.K.J.D., Evert J.S.H., et al. IL-15 superagonist N-803 improves IFNγ production and killing of leukemia and ovarian cancer cells by CD34+ progenitor-derived NK cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2020 Nov 3. DOI: 10.1007/s00262-020-02749-8

51. Hoogstad-van Evert J.S., Cany J., van den Brand D., Oudenampsen M., Brock R., Torensma R., et al. Umbilical cord blood CD34+ progenitorderived NK cells efficiently kill ovarian cancer spheroids and intraperitoneal tumors in NOD/SCID/IL2Rgnull mice. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6(8):e1320630. DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1320630

52. Pearce O.M.T., Delaine-Smith R.M., Maniati E., Nichols S., Wang J., Böhm S., et al. Deconstruction of a metastatic tumor microenvironment reveals a common matrix response in human cancers. Cancer Discov. 2018;8(3):304–19. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0284

53. He L., Wang Q., Zhao X. Microvessel density as a prognostic factor in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(3):869–74. DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.3.869

54. Qiu H., Cao L., Wang D., Xu H., Liang Z. High levels of circulating CD34+/VEGFR3+ lymphatic/vascular endothelial progenitor cells is correlated with lymph node metastasis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013;39(7):1268–75. DOI: 10.1111/jog.12047

55. Rea K., Roggiani F., De Cecco L., Raspagliesi F., Carcangiu M.L., NairMenon J., et al. Simultaneous E-cadherin and PLEKHA7 expression negatively affects E-cadherin/EGFR mediated ovarian cancer cell growth. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37(1):146. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-018-0796-1

56. Köbel M., Kang E.Y. The many uses of p53 immunohistochemistry in gynecological pathology: proceedings of the ISGyP companion society session at the 2020 USCAP Annual9 Meeting. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2021;40(1):32–40. DOI: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000725

57. Mayoral M., Paredes P., Saco A., Fusté P., Perlaza P., Tapias A., et al. Correlation of 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT with Ki67 immunohistochemistry in pre-treatment epithelial ovarian cancer. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2018;37(2):80–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2017.07.005

58. Li L.T., Jiang G., Chen Q., Zheng J.N. Ki67 is a promising molecular target in the diagnosis of cancer (review). Mol Med Rep. 2015;11(3):1566–72. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2014.2914

59. Ikehara Y., Shiuchi N., Kabata-Ikehara S., Nakanishi H., Yokoyama N., Takagi H., et al. Effective induction of anti-tumor immune responses with oligomannose-coated liposome targeting to intraperitoneal phagocytic cells. Cancer Lett. 2008;260(1–2):137–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.10.038

60. Wall J.A., Meza-Perez S., Scalise C.B., Katre A., Londoño A.I., Turbitt W.J., et al. Manipulating the Wnt/β- catenin signaling pathway to promote anti-tumor immune infiltration into the TME to sensitize ovarian cancer to ICB therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;160(1):285–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.10.031


Review

For citations:


Mustafin R.N., Khalikova L.V., Khusnutdinova E.K. Specific Features of Ovarian Cancer Metastasis. Creative surgery and oncology. 2020;10(4):319-329. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2020-10-4-319-329

Views: 11567


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2076-3093 (Print)
ISSN 2307-0501 (Online)