Preview

Creative surgery and oncology

Advanced search

Breast Cancer Surgery, History and Current State: a Literature Review

https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2021-11-3-220-227

Abstract

Breasts symbolise femininity, sexuality and motherhood. The breast size and shape affect the woman’s self-esteem and social activity. Surgical treatment of malignant breast diseases concerns the medical, psychological, social and sexual aspects of life. Surgery for breast cancer dawns back to 1,600 B.C., with a milestone operation of radical mastectomy proposed in 1891–1894 by W. Halsted and W. Meyer and modified by D. Patey and W. Dyson in 1948. Tissue preservation has shaped a trend towards improving the technique. Since the 1990s, the modified J. Madden’s operation has become the treatment standard in breast cancer, irregardless of stage. The improvement of mass first-visit check-up advanced early diagnosis of initial breast tumourisation, which also influenced the choice of surgical tactics. U. Veronesi proposed a variant of organ-preserving surgery in 1970–80s involving three-level axillary lymph node dissection quadrantectomy, followed by radiotherapy. This combination facilitated aesthetic results at no compromise of radicality of the treatment. The need to observe radicality and sustain aesthetics contributed to the integration of plastic surgery into oncological cure and emergence of reconstructive and plastic breast surgery. The field has entered new cycle. Oncoplastic surgery is recognised safe, improves aesthetics and gives a salutary impact on psychological and social adjustment. Manifold surgical options in breast cancer coexist and develop towards maximal tissue preservation.

About the Authors

E. P. Kashirina
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Elena P. Kashirina – Department of Faculty Surgery No. 1

Moscow



R. N. Komarov
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Roman N. Komarov – Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Invasive Cardiology; Aortic Surgery Unit, Aortic and Cardiac Surgery Clinic

Moscow



D. V. Vychuzhanin
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Dmitriy V. Vychuzhanin – Cand. Sci. (Med.), Department of Abdominal Surgery, Sechenov Clinical Centre

Moscow



References

1. Gilbert P. Body shame a biopsychosocial conceptualization and overview, with treatment implications. Routledge; 2002.

2. Tsygankova N.A., Narusov Yu.E. Aesthetic aspects of reconstructive breast surgery. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2015;2(S1):80 (In Russ.).

3. Sitnikova Yu.G., Kudaibergenova I.O., Dzhumabaeva F.T., Kim A.M. Oncological aspects of breast cancer conservation therapy. Vestnik KRSU. 2014;14(5):153–7 (In Russ.).

4. Harrison J., Maguire P. Predictors of psychiatric morbidity in cancer patients. Br J Psychiatry. 1994;165(5):593–8. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.165.5.593

5. Mendelevich V.D. Neurosology and psychosomatic medicine. Moscow: Gorodets; 2016. 596 p. (In Russ.).

6. Moyer A. Psychosocial outcomes of breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy: a meta-analytic review. Health Psychol. 1997;16(3):284-98. DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.16.3.284

7. Krivorotko P.V., Pesotskyy R.S., Zernov K.Yu., Bessonov A.A., Zhiltsova E.K., Komyakhov A.V., et al. Immediate breast reconstruction using titanised mesh. Tumors of female reproductive system. 2020;16(2):13–8 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1994-4098-2020-16-2-13-18

8. Malygin S.E. The role of mastectomy in treatment and prophylaxis of breast cancer: beginning, evolution and recent changes. Malignant tumours. 2015;(4):3–13 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2015-4-3-13

9. Halsted W.S.I. The results of radical operations for the cure of carcinoma of the breast. Ann Surg. 1907;46(1):1–19. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-190707000-00001

10. Meyer W. An improved method of the radical operation for carcinoma of the breast. New York: Trow Directory, Printing and Bookbinding Co; 1894. P. 1–16.

11. Davydov M.I. Clinical mammalogy: practice guidelines. Moscow: ABV — press; 2010. 154 p. (In Russ.).

12. Letyagin V.P. Evolution of surgical treatment for breast cancer. Tumors of female reproductive system. 2012;1:32–6 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1994-4098-2012-0-1-32-36

13. Ismagilov A.Kh., Khamitov A.R., Vanesyan A.S. The current pattern of reconstructive surgery for breast cancer. Tumors of female reproductive system. 2015:11(4):25–34 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1994-4098-2015-11-4-25-34

14. Holdin S.A. Advanced radical surgery for breast cancer. Leningrad: Meditsina; 1975. 232 p.

15. Urban J.A. Radical excision of chest wall for mammary cancer. Cancer. 1951;4(6):1263–85. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(195111)4:6<1263::AID-CNCR2820040613>3.0.CO;2-6

16. Veronesi U., Paganelli G., Galimberti V., Viale G., Zurrida S., Bedoni M., et al. Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes. Lancet. 1997;349(9069):1864–7. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)01004-0

17. Patey D.H., Dyson W.H. The prognosis of carcinoma of the breast in relation to the type of operation performed. Br J Cancer. 1948;2(1):7–13. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1948.2

18. Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D., Rasskazova E.A., Khakimova Sh.G. Oncological safety of radical subcutaneous / skin-sparing mastectomies with simultaneous reconstruction in cancer. Problems in Oncology. 2019;65(6):832–7 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.37469/0507-3758-2019-65-6-832-837

19. Maksimov D.A., Sergeev A.N., Morozov A.M., Peltikhina O.V., Minakova Yu.E. About modern types of surgical treatment for breast cancer (literature review). Journal of New Medical Technologies. 2021 [cited 2021 Jan 11];1 [about 7 p.]. Available from: http://www.medtsu.tula.ru/VNMT/Bulletin/E2021-1/1-1.pdf (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24412/2075-4094-2021-1-1-1

20. Madden J.L. Modified radical mastectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1965;121(6):1221–30. PMID: 5851617

21. Fisher B. Biological and clinical considerations regarding the use of surgery and chemotherapy in the treatment of primary breast cancer. Cancer. 1977;40(1 Suppl):574–87. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197707)40:1+<574::aid-cncr2820400724>3.0.co;2-o

22. Chu C.K., Hanson S.E., Hwang R.F., Wu L.C. Oncoplastic partial breast reconstruction: concepts and techniques. Gland Surg. 2021;10(1):398–410. DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-380

23. Atkins H., Hayward J.L., Klugman D.J., Wayte A.B. Treatment of early breast cancer: a report after ten years of a clinical trial. Br Med J. 1972;2(5811):423–9. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5811.423

24. Semiglazov V.F. Diverse biology of breast cancer: search for adequate treatment. Malignant tumours. 2016;3:5–10 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2016-3-5-10

25. Urban C., Anselmi K.F., Kuroda F., Schwartz J.C. Oncoplasty as the standard of care in breast cancer surgery. Eur Oncol Haematol. 2014;1(10):43–7. DOI: 10.17925/EOH.2014.10.1.43

26. Clough K.B., Kaufman G.J., Nos C., Buccimazza I., Sarfati I.M. Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(5):1375–91. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0792-y

27. Vorotnikov I.K., Letyagin V.P., Vysotskaya I.V., Sel’chuk V.Yu., Burov D.A., Pavlov A.V. Surgical treatment of breast cancer: from the concept of eradication to aesthetic surgery. Tumors of female reproductive system. 2018;14(2):42–53 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1994-4098-2018-14-2-42-53

28. Toth B.A., Lappert P. Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87(6):1048–53. PMID: 1852020

29. Simmons R.M., Brennan M., Christos P., King V., Osborne M. Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9(2):165–8. DOI: 10.1007/BF02557369

30. Carlson G.W., Bostwick J. 3rd, Styblo T.M., Moore B., Bried J.T., Murray D.R., et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy. Oncologic and reconstructive considerations. Ann Surg. 1997;225(5):570–5; discussion 575–8. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199705000-00013

31. Zikiryahodjaev A.D., Ermoshchenkova M.V., Kaprin A.D., Chissov V.I., Zapirov G.M. Modern trends in the breast cancer conserving surgery and oncoplastic breast surgery. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2018;63(6):51–8. DOI: 10.12737/article_5c0eb1e48ccda8.47993356

32. Pukancsik D., Kelemen P., Újhelyi M., Kovács E., Udvarhelyi N., Mészáros N., et al. Objective decision making between conventional and oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy: An aesthetic and functional prospective cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(2):303–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.11.010

33. Laronga C., Kemp B., Johnston D., Robb G.L., Singletary S.E. The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6(6):609–13. DOI: 10.1007/s10434-999-0609-z

34. Munhoz A.M., Montag E., Filassi J.R., Gemperli R. Immediate nippleareola-sparing mastectomy reconstruction: An update on oncological and reconstruction techniques. World J Clin Oncol. 2014;5(3):478–94. DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.478

35. Endara M., Chen D., Verma K., Nahabedian M.Y., Spear S.L. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of the literature with pooled analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(5):1043–54. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a48b8a

36. Stolier A.J., Sullivan S.K., Dellacroce F.J. Technical considerations in nipple-sparing mastectomy: 82 consecutive cases without necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(5):1341–7. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9753-5

37. Sahin I., Isik S., Alhan D., Yıldız R., Aykan A., Ozturk E. One-staged silicone implant breast reconstruction following bilateral nipple-sparing prophylactic mastectomy in patients at high-risk for breast cancer. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013;37(2):303–11. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-012-0044-6

38. Woo J., Lee J., Paek S.H., Lim W. Feasibility and safety of breast-conserving surgery via a periareolar incision for cancers located far from the nipple-areolar complex: a retrospective study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021;147(3):893–900. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03385-6

39. Blechman K.M., Karp N.S., Levovitz C., Guth A.A., Axelrod D.M., Shapiro R.L., et al. The lateral inframammary fold incision for nipplesparing mastectomy: outcomes from over 50 immediate implant-based breast reconstructions. Breast J. 2013;19(1):31–40. DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12043

40. Colwell A.S., Gadd M., Smith B.L., Austen W.G. Jr. An inferolateral approach to nipple-sparing mastectomy: optimizing mastectomy and reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;65(2):140–3. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181c1fe77

41. Wijayanayagam A., Kumar A.S., Foster R.D., Esserman L.J. Optimizing the total skin-sparing mastectomy. Arch Surg. 2008;143(1):38–45. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.143.1.38. PMID: 18209151

42. Munhoz A.M., Aldrighi C.M., Montag E., Arruda E.G., Aldrighi J.M., Gemperli R., et al. Clinical outcomes following nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: a 12-year experience with an analysis of patient and breast-related factors for complications. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;140(3):545–55. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2634-7

43. Weber W.P., Soysal S.D., El-Tamer M., Sacchini V., Knauer M., Tausch C., et al. First international consensus conference on standardization of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;165(1):139–49. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4314-5

44. Hashem T., Morsi A., Farahat A., Zaghloul T., Hamed A. Correlation of specimen/breast volume ratio to cosmetic outcome after breast conserving surgery. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2019;10(4):668–72. DOI: 10.1007/s13193-019-00973-y

45. Riis M. Modern surgical treatment of breast cancer. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020;56:95–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.06.016

46. Leser C., Tan Y.Y., Singer C., Zeillinger R., Fitzal F., Lehrner J., et al. Patient satisfaction after breast cancer surgery: A prospective clinical trial. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2021;133(1–2):6–13. DOI: 10.1007/s00508-020-01730-w

47. Dahlbäck C., Manjer J., Rehn M., Ringberg A. Determinants for patient satisfaction regarding aesthetic outcome and skin sensitivity after breast-conserving surgery. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14(1):303. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-016-1053-8

48. Li J., Zhong G., Wang K., Kang W., Wei W. Tumor-to-gland volume ratio versus tumor-to-breast ratio as measured on CBBCT: possible predictors of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer Manag Res. 2021;13:4463–71. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S312288

49. Youssef M.M.G., Namour A., Youssef O.Z., Morsi A. Oncologic and cosmetic outcomes of oncoplastic breast surgery in locally advanced breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, experience from a developing country. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2018;9(3):300–6. DOI: 10.1007/s13193-017-0689-3

50. Wijgman D.J., Ten Wolde B., van Groesen N.R., Keemers-Gels M.E., van den Wildenberg F.J., Strobbe L.J. Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(4):665–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.11.021

51. Korvald C., L’orange I.C. Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2020;140(3). DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.19.0371

52. Scomacao I., AlHilli Z., Schwarz G. The role of oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2020;21(12):94. DOI: 10.1007/s11864-020-00793-1

53. Palsdottir E.P., Lund S.H.L., Asgeirsson K.S.A. Oncoplastic breastconserving surgery in Iceland: a population-based study. Scand J Surg. 2018;107(3):224–9. DOI: 10.1177/1457496918766686

54. Kosasih S., Tayeh S., Mokbel K., Kasem A. Is oncoplastic breast conserving surgery oncologically safe? A meta-analysis of 18,103 patients. Am J Surg. 2020;220(2):385–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.12.019

55. Gowda A.U., Nie J., Mets E., Alperovich M., Avraham T. Risk factors for lymphedema after breast conservation therapy and oncoplastic reduction. Ann Plast Surg. 2020. Publish Ahead of Print. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002630


Review

For citations:


Kashirina E.P., Komarov R.N., Vychuzhanin D.V. Breast Cancer Surgery, History and Current State: a Literature Review. Creative surgery and oncology. 2021;11(3):220-227. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2021-11-3-220-227

Views: 5472


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2076-3093 (Print)
ISSN 2307-0501 (Online)