Preview

Creative surgery and oncology

Advanced search

Robot-Assisted Surgery in Treating Postoperative Strictures of Lower Third of Ureter

https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2023-3

Abstract

Introduction. The incidence of postoperative ureteral strictures induced by iatrogenic injuries tends to increase. Reconstructive surgery involves open or laparoscopic intervention to repair strictures. However, both methods have their drawbacks. Surgical treating strictures of the lower third of the ureter can be effectively performed by means of robotic surgery.

Aim. To determine outcomes of robot-assisted reconstructive surgery in treating postoperative strictures of the lower third of the ureter.

Materials and methods. Five female patients with postoperative strictures of the lower third of the ureter underwent robot-assisted reconstructive surgery. Clinical and radiological outcomes in the long-term postoperative period were determined.

Results and discussion. Two patients underwent simultaneous robot-assisted reconstructive surgery, namely, robot-assisted uretero-cysto-neoanastomosis on the right side and Boari operation on the left; robot-assisted Boari operation and isolation of post-traumatic uretero-vaginal fistula. In the remaining three cases, robot-assisted Boari operation and uretero-cysto-neoanastomosis with psoas-hitch were performed. No evidence of ureteral stricture in all cases was detected via multislice spiral CT (MSCT) urography in 3 months after surgery.

Conclusion. At present, robot-assisted reconstructive surgery, being suitable for simultaneous surgery, is safe and effective when
treating postoperative strictures of the lower third of the ureter.

About the Authors

M. S. Mosoyan
Almazov National Medical Research Centre; Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation

Mkrtich S. Mosoyan — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Urology Department with a course of Robotic Surgery, Robotic Surgery Centre 

 Saint Petersburg 



G. Sh. Shanava
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Russian Federation

 Gocha Sh. Shanava — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Urology Department with a course of Robotic Surgery 

 Saint Petersburg 



R. E. Nikulin
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Russian Federation

Roman E. Nikulin — Resident, Urology Department with a course of Robotic Surgery 

 Saint Petersburg 



References

1. 1 Xiong M., Zhu X., Chen D., Hossain M.A., Xie Y., Gou X., et al. Post ureteroscopic stone surgery ureteral strictures management: a retrospective study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2020;52:841–9. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02375-4

2. 2 Gild P., Kluth L.A., Vetterlein M.W., Engel O., Chun F.K.H., Fisch M. Adult iatrogenic ureteral injury and stricture–incidence and treatment strategies. Asian J Urol. 2018;5(2):101–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.02.003

3. 3 Carbonara U., Branche B., Cisu T., Crocerossa F., Guruli G., Grob M.B., et al. Robot-assisted ureteral reimplantation: a single-center comparative study. J Endourol. 2021;35(10):1504–11. DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0083

4. 4 Lo T.S., Wijaya T., Lo M., Kao C.C., Wu P.Y., Cortes E.F.M., et al. Clinical relevance and treatment selection of ureteral injury after cesarean section. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22:303–6. DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000275

5. 5 Ding G., Cheng S., Li X., Fang D., Yang K., Tang Q., et al. Experience managing distal ureteral strictures with Boari flap psoas hitch and comparison of open and laparoscopic procedures. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10(1):56–65. DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-789

6. 6 Loran O.B., Seregin A.V., Dovlatov Z.A. Surgical treatment of iatrogenic strictures and obliterations in the pelvic ureter in women. Experimental and clinical urology. 2015;(3):128–31 (In Russ.).

7. 7 Asghar A.M., Lee R.A., Yang K.K., Metro M., Eun D.D. Robot-assisted distal ureteral reconstruction for benign pathology: current state. Investig Clin Urol. 2020;61(1):23–32. DOI: 10.4111/icu.2020.61.S1.S23

8. 8 Sagalovich D., Garisto J., Bertolo R., Yerram N., Dagenais J., Chavali J.S., et al. Minimally invasive management of ureteral distal strictures: robotic ureteroneocystostomy with a bilateral Boari flap. Urology. 2018;120:268. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.06.023

9. 9 Franklin A., Pokala N., Jones C., Johans C., Strom K., Cummings L. Is the robotic approach feasible for repair of iatrogenic injuries of the lower ureter? World J Urol. 2016;34:1323–8. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1768-8

10. 10 Dunfield V.M. Boari operation in case of solitary kidney; treatment of obstruction of solitary ureter following hysterectomy. AMA Arch Surg. 1955;70:328–32. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1955.01270090006003

11. 11 Kolontarev K., Pushkar D., Rasner P., Reva .I. Robotic uretherocystoanastomosis in ureteral injury. The experience of four cases. Medical Council. 2014;(19):46–9 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21518/2079-701X-2014-19-46-49

12. 12 Strik C., Stommel M.W., Schipper L.J., van Goor H., Ten Broek R.P. Risk factors for future repeat abdominal surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016;401:829–37. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-016-1414-3

13. 13 Obiora D., Yang H., Gor R.A. Robotic assisted reconstruction for complications following urologic oncologic procedures. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10(5):2272–9. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2020.03.15

14. 14 Kozinn S.I., Canes D., Sorcini A., Moinzadeh A. Robotic versus open distal ureteral reconstruction and reimplantation for benign stricture disease. J Endourol. 2012;26(2):147–51. DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0234

15. 15 Singh M., Garg G., Sankhwar S. N., Kumar M. Laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy for mid and lower ureteric strictures: Experience from a tertiary center. Urol Ann. 2018;10(3):243–48. DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_137_17

16. 16 Buffi N.M., Lughezzani G., Hurle R., Lazzeri M., Taverna G., Bozzini G., et al. Robot-assisted surgery for benign ureteral strictures: experience and outcomes from four tertiary care institutions. Eur Urol. 2017;71(6):945–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.022


Review

For citations:


Mosoyan M.S., Shanava G.Sh., Nikulin R.E. Robot-Assisted Surgery in Treating Postoperative Strictures of Lower Third of Ureter. Creative surgery and oncology. 2023;13(1):21-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2023-3

Views: 667


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2076-3093 (Print)
ISSN 2307-0501 (Online)