Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Chemo-Hormonal Therapy in Patients with Luminal В HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2026-16-2-171-177
Abstract
Introduction. Breast cancer remains the leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality among women. In hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative disease, achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy is an important prognostic factor. Aim. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of adding tamoxifen to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with hormone-sensitive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Materials and methods. A prospective randomized study included 40 preand postmenopausal patients with indications for neoadjuvant chemotherapy using the 4ddAC → 4T regimen. Patients were assigned to two groups: Group A (n = 20) received additional tamoxifen, while Group B (n = 20) received chemotherapy alone. The primary endpoint was the pCR rate, assessed using the Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) system.
Results and discussion. The pCR rate (RCB-0) was 10% in both groups. The distribution of residual tumor burden across RCB classes was similar, with no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05). Combined chemo-hormonal therapy demonstrated acceptable tolerability; no serious adverse events were reported. All patients completed treatment and subsequently underwent surgery. The addition of tamoxifen did not improve the likelihood of achieving pCR, confirming its limited role in this neoadjuvant regimen.
Conclusion. The study demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety between the two treatment strategies. The absence of benefit from adding tamoxifen highlights the need to explore new therapeutic approaches to improve outcomes in this patient population.
Keywords
About the Authors
M. V. SharavinaRussian Federation
Mariia V. Sharavina — Female Reproductive System Tumor Unit
Moscow
V. V. Vorotnikov
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Vorotnikov — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Female Reproductive System Tumor Unit, Department of Plastic Surgery
Moscow
A. V. Soinov
Russian Federation
Alexandr V. Soinov — Department of Oncology
Moscow
A. O. Rassolova
Russian Federation
Alina O. Rassolova — Postgraduate Student, Department of Oncology and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Moscow
M. I. Mukueva
Russian Federation
Marha I. Mukueva — Female Reproductive System Tumor Unitс
Moscow
V. A. Andreeva
Russian Federation
Victoria A. Andreeva — Female Reproductive System Tumor Unit
Moscow
D. S. Romanov
Russian Federation
Denis S. Romanov — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy
Moscow
T. G. Mchedlidze
Russian Federation
Tornike G. Mchedlidze — Female Reproductive System Tumor Unit
Moscow
S. A. Abdugafforov
Russian Federation
Sardor A. Abdugafforov — Female Reproductive System Tumor Unit
Moscow
I. V. Kopytich
Russian Federation
Igor V. Kopytich — Female Reproductive System Tumor Unit
Moscow
References
1. Bray F., Laversanne M., Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Soerjomataram I., et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229–63. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21834
2. Kim J., Harper A., McCormack V., Sung H., Houssami N., Morgan E., et al. Global patterns and trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality across 185 countries. Nat Med. 2025;31(4):1154–62. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-025-03502-3
3. Darida M., Rubovszky G., Kiss Z., Székely B., Madaras B., Horváth Z., et al. Improvement in breast cancer survival across molecular subtypes in Hungary between 2011 and 2020: a nationwide, retrospective study. Front Oncol. 2025;15:1465511. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1465511
4. Falck A.K., Fernö M., Bendahl P.O., Rydén L. St Gallen molecular subtypes in primary breast cancer and matched lymph node metastases--aspects on distribution and prognosis for patients with luminal A tumours: results from a prospective randomised trial. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:558. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-558
5. Louis D.M., Nair L.M., Vallonthaiel A.G., Narmadha M.P., Vijaykumar D.K. Ki 67: a promising prognostic marker in early breast cancer-a review article. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2023;14(1):122–7. DOI: 10.1007/s13193-022-01631-6
6. Boughey J.C., Hoskin T.L., Goetz M.P. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and nodal response rates in luminal breast cancer: effects of age and tumor Ki67. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(9):5747–56. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11871-z
7. Spring L.M., Fell G., Arfe A., Sharma C., Greenup R., Reynolds K.L., et al. Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and impact on breast cancer recurrence and survival: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(12):2838– 48. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3492
8. Conforti F., Pala L., Sala I., Oriecuia C., De Pas T., Specchia C., et al. Evaluation of pathological complete response as surrogate endpoint in neoadjuvant randomised clinical trials of early stage breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2021;375:e066381. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066381
9. Lee J. Current treatment landscape for early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). J Clin Med. 2023;12(4):1524. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041524
10. Berruti A., Amoroso V., Gallo F., Bertaglia V., Simoncini E., Pedersini R., et al. Pathologic complete response as a potential surrogate for the clinical outcome in patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a meta-regression of 29 randomized prospective studies. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(34):3883–91. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.2836
11. Cortazar P., Zhang L., Untch M., Mehta K., Costantino J.P., Wolmark N., et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: The CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014;384(9938):164–72. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62422-8
12. Michaeli D.T., Michaeli T. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and tumor response benefit supporting initial US food and drug administration approval and indication extension of new cancer drugs, 2003-2021. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(35):4095–106. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.00535
13. Cantini L., Trapani D., Guidi L., Boscolo Bielo L., Scafetta R., Koziej M., et al. Neoadjuvant therapy in hormone Receptor-Positive/ HER2-Negative breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2023;123:102669. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102669
14. Lerebours F., Cabel L., Pierga J.Y. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer management: state of the art. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(4):902. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040902
15. Bui K.T., Willson M.L., Goel S., Beith J., Goodwin A. Ovarian suppression for adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;2020(3):CD013538. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013538
16. Eiermann W., Paepke S., Appfelstaedt J., Llombart-Cussac A., Eremin J., Vinholes J., et al. Preoperative treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients with letrozole: A randomized double-blind multicenter study. Ann Oncol. 2001;12(11):1527–32. DOI: 10.1023/a:1013128213451
17. Masuda N., Sagara Y., Kinoshita T., Iwata H., Nakamura S., Yanagita Y., et al. Neoadjuvant anastrozole versus tamoxifen in patients receiving goserelin for premenopausal breast cancer (STAGE): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(4):345–52. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70373-4
18. Smith I.E., Dowsett M., Ebbs S.R., Dixon J.M., Skene A., Blohmer J.U., et al. Neoadjuvant treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer with anastrozole, tamoxifen, or both in combination: the Immediate Preoperative Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or Combined with Tamoxifen (IMPACT) multicenter double-blind randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(22):5108–16. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.005
19. Cataliotti L., Buzdar A.U., Noguchi S., Bines J., Takatsuka Y., Petrakova K., et al. Comparison of anastrozole versus tamoxifen as preoperative therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: the Pre-Operative “Arimidex” Compared to Tamoxifen (PROACT) trial. Cancer. 2006;106(10):2095–103. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21872
20. Sahrayi H., Hosseini E., Karimifard S., Khayam N., Meybodi S.M., Amiri S., et al. Co-Delivery of letrozole and cyclophosphamide via folic acid-decorated nanoniosomes for breast cancer therapy: synergic effect, augmentation of cytotoxicity, and apoptosis gene expression. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021;15(1):6. DOI: 10.3390/ph15010006
21. Alba E., Calvo L., Albanell J., De la Haba J.R., Arcusa Lanza A., Chacon J.I., et al. Chemotherapy (CT) and hormonotherapy (HT) as neoadjuvant treatment in luminal breast cancer patients: results from the GEICAM/2006-03, a multicenter, randomized, phase-II study. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(12):3069–74. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds132
22. Kim H.J., Noh W.C., Lee E.S., Jung Y.S., Kim L.S., Han W., et al. Efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pre-menopausal patients with oestrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative, lymph node-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2020;22(1):54. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-020-01288-5
23. Nguyen S.M., Pham A.T., Nguyen L.M., Cai H., Tran T.V., Shu X.O., et al. Chemotherapy-induced toxicities and their associations with clinical and non-clinical factors among breast cancer patients in Vietnam. Curr Oncol. 2022;29(11):8269–84. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29110653
24. Vorotnikov V.V., Pakhomova R.A., Soinov A.V., Gunina A.S., Kopytich I.V., Tsoi M.G., et al. Preoperative hormone therapy in the treatment of breast cancer: What do we know so far? Creative Surgery and Oncology. 2022;12(3):199–204 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24060/2076-3093-2022-12-3-199-204
25. Ma C.X., Suman V.J., Sanati S., Vij K., Anurag M., Leitch A.M., et al. Endocrine-sensitive disease rate in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-rich/ERBB2-negative breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant anastrozole, fulvestrant, or their combination: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2024;10(3):362–71. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6038
26. Ellis M.J., Ma C. Letrozole in the neoadjuvant setting: the P024 trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;105(Suppl 1):33–43. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-007-9701-x
27. Martí C., Sánchez-Méndez J.I. The present and future of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer treatment. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(11):2538. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112538
28. Madigan L.I., Dinh P., Graham J.D. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in locally advanced estrogen or progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer: determining the optimal endocrine agent and treatment duration in postmenopausal women-a literature review and proposed guidelines. Breast Cancer Res. 2020;22(1):77. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-020-01314-6
29. Hunt K.K., Suman V.J., Wingate H.F., Leitch A.M., Unzeitig G., Boughey J.C., et al. Local-regional recurrence after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: data from ACOSOG Z1031 (Alliance), a randomized phase 2 neoadjuvant comparison between letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive clinical stage 2 or 3 breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023;30(4):2111–8. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12972-5
30. Zhang J., Lu C.Y., Chen H.M., Wu S.Y. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy for invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast with high hormone receptor positivity and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negativity. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(3):e211785. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1785
31. Gu C., He Y., Zhang N., Liu Y., Li J., Wang T., et al. A non-inferior randomized trial of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal patients with hormone-responsive and HER2-Negative lymph node-negative breast cancer. Cancer Control. 2025;32:10732748251339958. DOI: 10.1177/10732748251339958
Review
For citations:
Sharavina M.V., Vorotnikov V.V., Soinov A.V., Rassolova A.O., Mukueva M.I., Andreeva V.A., Romanov D.S., Mchedlidze T.G., Abdugafforov S.A., Kopytich I.V. Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Chemo-Hormonal Therapy in Patients with Luminal В HER2-Negative Breast Cancer. Creative surgery and oncology. 2026;16(2):171-177. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2026-16-2-171-177
JATS XML


























