Hip Arthroplasty of the Destructive-Dystrophic Lesions
https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2018-8-1-21-27
Abstract
Introduction. Hip arthroplasty is considered to be the most effective method providing social and household reintegration for destructive-dystrophic lesions. Goal of the study is to improve the results of surgical treatment using the technology of arthroplasty in patients with decompensated forms of destructive-dystrophic hip joint lesions. Material and methods. It was an open prospective, randomized study carried out on the base of traumatology and ortopaedics department of the Bashkir State Medical University including 710 patients with decompensated destructivedystrophic hip joint lesions. All patients (n=710, of which 6.1% were female) depending on the diacritic approach were divided into groups: the control group included (n=406) patients with hip joint trauma who were provided a conventional range of diagnostic and treatment procedures; the experimental group (n=304) included patients who had a range of diagnostics and treatment of destructive-dystrophic lesions of hip joints based on assessment of the connective tissue phase state. Results. Biometric indicators of stance and walking phase firmly improved in all groups 3 years after arthroplasty (p<0.05). Comparative analysis of arthroplasty results in the research groups showed effectiveness of the developed concept to surgically treat destructive and dystrophic lesions of hip joint on the basis of the system approach in the form of improved parameters of the components of the local and systemic level by 2.38% and 2.3% for osteoarthrosis (p<0.05), by 1.61% and 1.84% for aseptic necrosis of femoral head (p>0.05), by 5.62% and 4.37% for post-traumatic damage of hip joint (p<0.05). Conclusion. Analysis of short-term and long-term results of arthroplasty showed high efficiency of the developed concept of surgical treatment and monitoring of connective tissue phase state at destructive-dystrophic lesions of hip joints based on the system approach in the form of reduced pain syndrome, improvement of functional possibilities and patients life quality.
About the Authors
B. S. Minasov
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics with the Course of Additional Professional Education,
3 Lenin str., Ufa, 450008
R. R. Yakupov
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Associate professor at the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics with the Course of Additional Professional Education,
3 Lenin str., Ufa, 450008
T. B. Minasov
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor at the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics with the Course of Additional Professional Education,
3 Lenin str., Ufa, 450008
M. M. Valeev
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor at the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics with the Course of Additional Professional Education,
3 Lenin str., Ufa, 450008
T. R. Mavlyutov
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor at the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics with the Course of Additional Professional Education,
3 Lenin str., Ufa, 450008
G. N. Filimonov
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Applicant at the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics with the Course of Additional Professional Education,
3 Lenin str., Ufa, 450008
References
1. Onuoha K.O., Solow M., Newman J.M., Sodhi N., Pivec R., Khlopas A., et al. Have the annual trends of total hip arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis patients decreased? Ann Transl Med. 2017;5(Suppl 3):S35. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.11.15
2. Suto T., Okamura K., Yonemoto Y., Okura C., Tsushima Y., Takagishi K. Prediction of large joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using 18F-FDG PET/CT and disease activity score. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(7):e2841. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002841
3. Klit J. Results of total joint arthroplasty and joint preserving surgery in younger patients evaluated by alternative outcome measures. Dan Med J. 2014;61(4):B4836. PMID: 24814600
4. Finkbone P.R., Severson E.P., Cabanela M.E., Trousdale R.T. Ceramicon-ceramic total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 20 years. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(2):213–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.05.022
5. Wang T., Sun J.Y., Zhao X.J., Liu Y., Yin H.B. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings total hip arthroplasty in young patients. Arthroplast Today. 2016; 2(4):205–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2016.04.004
6. Taheriazam A., Saeidinia A. Conversion of failed hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty: a short-term follow-up study. Medicine. 2017;96(40):e8235. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008235
7. Lee J.K., Choi C.-H. Total knee arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2012;24:1–6. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008235
8. Hofstede S.N., Nouta K.A., Jacobs W., van Hooff M.L., Wymenga A.B., Pijls B.G., et al. Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(2):CD003130. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003130.pub3
9. Taheriazam A., Saeidinia A. Cementless one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty in osteoarthritis patients: functional outcomes and complications. Orthop Rev. 2017;9(2):6897. DOI: 10.4081/or.2017.6897
10. Ravi B., Escott B., Shah P.S., Jenkinson R., Chahal J., Bogoch E., et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing complications following total joint arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis versus for osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(12):3839–49. DOI: 10.1002/art.37690
11. Trubin A.R. Assessment of the quality of life of patients with injuriesand diseases of the hip after total hip arthroplasty. Creative surgery and oncology. 2013;(3):68–70.
12. Slobodskoy A.B., Osintsev E.Yu., Lezhnev A.G., Voronin I.V., Badak I.S., Dunaev A.G. Risk factors for periprosthetic infection after large joint arthroplasty. Vestnik travmatologii i ortopedii imeni N.N. Priorova. 2015;(2):13–8. (in Russ.)
13. Glassou E.N., Hansen T.B., Mäkelä K., Havelin L.I., Furnes O., Badawy M., et al. Association between hospital procedure volume and risk of revision after total hip arthroplasty: a population-based study within the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016;24(3):419–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.09.014 (in Russ.)
14. Jones S.A. The prevention and treatment of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty: efforts to date and future strategies. Hip Int. 2015:25(4):388–92. DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000273
15. Sculco P.K., Cottino U., Abdel M.P., Sierra R.J. Avoiding hip instability and limb length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2016;47(2):327–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2015.09.006
16. Zagra L., Caboni E. Total hip arthroplasty instability treatment without dual mobility cups: brief overview and experience of other options. Int Orthop. 2017;41(3):661–68. DOI:10.1007/s00264-016-3383-0
Review
For citations:
Minasov B.S., Yakupov R.R., Minasov T.B., Valeev M.M., Mavlyutov T.R., Filimonov G.N. Hip Arthroplasty of the Destructive-Dystrophic Lesions. Creative surgery and oncology. 2018;8(1):21-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2018-8-1-21-27
Views:
843
Email this article 